Skip to main content

More about credit score

Image
By scooby
I’ve been offered a job at the lab and am going through the rigorous clearance screening process. I am not sure whether I should tell the HR department that my credit is not perfect. We lost our home during the recession and what followed was some pretty damaging stuff on our credit. The position that they are considering me for has access to proprietary information. Can you please ask other bloggers if they have any thoughts regarding this dilemma? Thank you in advanced. Signed, Midscore640

Comments

Anonymous said…
Not sure why you are asking this group. You signed a waiver allowing them to look at your credit and bank information, right?

Were you asked point blank about whether you had credit issues? It is probably moot since they already know. Unless you did not bring it up during the window in which they asked you about these things, it's not up to you to bring it up.

But you can go ahead and tell HR. It's a plus for your integrity and honesty. If they somehow missed it (and it was a deciding factor), they will eventually catch it. Better now than later, if you want to not have to worry about it hanging over your head.

My guess is that it wasn't a deciding factor.
12/26/2013 6:12 PM
Anonymous said…
This is a really odd question. The answer should have been bloody obvious. Either you are clueless, not explaining your dilemma very clearly and being misunderstood, or you are trolling/phishing.
12/27/2013 5:25 AM
Anonymous said…
This was covered in another thread recently. But to summarize: the only reasons that LLNL will care about your credit history is if it a) directly indicates that you break the law; b) shows that you were dishonest when asked questions which were essentially part of your job application; or c)are subject to potential blackmail (that is, you're hiding your poor credit history and somebody could exploit that fact to get you to do somethng that is not in LLNL's best interests).

If you answered all of the questions on all the official paperwork and in the official interviews honestly & without omission, you're fine. The folks who process your application are good at asking ALL the important questions.

If, however, you omitted information when asked, you should let the hiring person know, to lay to rest items b and c
12/27/2013 3:15 PM
Anonymous said…
I know someone who lost his home, in a short sale, due to unemployment during the recession. LLNL hired him, and he got a Q clearance in due time.
12/28/2013 9:37 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

By scooby
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
96 comments
Read more