Skip to main content

Held's comments

Given Held's comments: In February, Held said DOE/NNSA was looking to move toward more of a “public interest” model of management for the nuclear weapons laboratories and away from the high fees paid to Bechtel and University of California-run contractor teams at Los Alamos and Livermore... "My strong feeling is these institutions exist to serve the public interest. They do not exist for profit maximization," and given that Held concurred with Goldstein's selection, I would expect Goldstein, as President of LLNS, to be quite willing to accommodate the changes NNSA is trying to make.

Comments

Anonymous said…
B**t-f**king a**hole.

Those high contractor fees came right out of the budget for total employee compensation.

-1700 LLNL folks were fired to pay those fees.
-Compensation was reduced for others.
-The pension was lost for new employees.
-Salaries were frozen for years. -Training budgets were eliminated.

If that fee refund is anyone's, it belongs to LLNL employees, not some worthless NNSA fleabag whose worthless predecessors caused the problem.

Damnation to Bodman. A high-speed shoe for Held.

Anonymous said…
Gosh, angry much? Don't like change, huh? Doubt you're ready for rational discussion. I hope you don't own guns. Please get help.
Anonymous said…
If that fee refund is anyone's, it belongs to LLNL employees, not some worthless NNSA fleabag whose worthless predecessors caused the problem.

March 30, 2014 at 3:47 PM

You do realize that the fee goes into the US Treasury general fund and the NNSA employees just get their salary? Try to calm down.
Anonymous said…
Sorry. The profound stupidity of privatizing the labs will torment me to my death.

s/original poster
Anonymous said…
s/original poster

March 31, 2014 at 6:55 PM

Very poignant. Except, I am the OP here, not you. One might tell by the tone and subject of the OP vs your pessimistic drivel.
Anonymous said…
correction.

s/first commenter rather than s/original poster.
Anonymous said…
It is very clear that LLNS has assigned some of their worthless 'managers' to the janitorial task of posting to this blog in an attempt to refute the logic of the rational LLNL employees who are disgusted with the treatment they are getting from the crooks of LANS.
Anonymous said…
clear as mud
Anonymous said…
case in point!
Anonymous said…
If you are going to take the time to post, why not try to make an actual point?
Anonymous said…
"If you are going to take the time to post, why not try to make an actual point?"

Whats your point?
Anonymous said…
No point, just asking a question. Is that not allowed?
uniform said…
Appreciation is probably incalculable. Thanks for sharing. I’ll come back to read more of your works.

www.n8fan.net
Unknown said…
Nice article love to read the whole new way of your writing this things.

Shan
www.gofastek.com

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!