Skip to main content

Any insight?

Does any one have any insight into:

-The impacts of Davis Bacon on the Lab. I have heard some crafts people are earning over $60 dollars an hour. If this is true, how is this impacting the budget?

-What is the latest on negotiations with the Lab and the Union? Has there been any progress?

Comments

Anonymous said…
You ave heard wrong. Get a hearing aid.
Anonymous said…
I don't think $60 is unrealistic. I make $58.xx on Davis Bacon projects. The Davis Bacon rate is different for each person. It varies by what type of insurance, how many dependents, TCP1 or TCP2 and how much vacation or sick leave you have taken recently. I am married with dependents and on TCP1. It not that unrealistic that a person with out dependents and on TCP2 could earn more then I even if we are earn the same wage when not on Davis Bacon projects.

I would also like to know how this extra cost in wadges is affecting the Labs bottom line.
Anonymous said…
Here are glaring examples of how unions are killing America. Why should a worker's personal family situation affect his/her wage or salary? Why are not capability, performance, and productivity the only measures? Why should I, as a taxpayer, put up with this nonsense? Why isn't it a competition for the best workers? If you can't make it on your own personal merits, you should be out!
Anonymous said…
In the army (when it was mostly draftees) the married guys were paid more, and also could receive a housing allowance.
Each according to their need.

Then there's the guy who when told he'd be paid what he was worth, got mad, and exclaimed: "Why, I would not work for that little!"
Anonymous said…
Each according to their need.

October 1, 2014 at 2:01 PM

"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs" - Karl Marx. Any more truth needed that unions are communist?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!