Weapons Complex Monitor
October 9, 2014
LLNL Avoids Fine For 2013 Sulfuric Acid Burn Incident
Already hit with a $365,000 fee reduction for a 2013 sulfuric acid burn event that left two employees with first - and second-degree burns, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory avoided further penalties for the incident, according to a Preliminary Notice of Violation sent to the lab last week. The workers received sulfuric acid burns to their face, extremities and torso from a direct acid splash when a 100-liter reaction vessel sprayed a work area at the lab’s Site 300. The workers were performing chemical synthesis of a high explosive. A third worker was exposed to sulfuric acid mist but encountered no other injuries, the NNSA said. “The event revealed deficiencies in work planning and control processes, emergency response,
The NNSA declined to penalize Livermore beyond the $365,000 fee reduction already imposed on the lab [LLNS], and a lab spokeswoman said the issues addressed in the investigation have been take care of. “The safety and security of the Laboratory’s employees, facilities and the surrounding communities remain of utmost importance,” spokeswoman Lynda Seaver said in a statement. “Since this incident the Laboratory has addressed the issues cited in the report. The Laboratory will
3 comments:
I heard about this when it happened. The lab did a good job in keeping it quiet for so long. That's the advantage of having a bunch of workers with no job mobility. Very unlikely to have dissent among the ranks or any whistle-blowing.
"...I heard about this when it happened. The lab did a good job in keeping it quiet for so long. That's the advantage of having a bunch of workers with no job mobility. Very unlikely to have dissent among the ranks or any whistle-blowing..."
Are you saying HEAF/Site 300 B Division and DTED employees are captured, and have little choice but to keep quiet or face having their jobs "go away"?
How long after the acid burn did LLNS publicly acknowledge the accident occurrence?
Post a Comment