Skip to main content

I remember when LANS first arrived.

Image
By
 I found this old post. 

"Most people know how Halliburton/KBR (The 'K' in KSL) uses their political connections to rip-off US taxpayers. Now, Bechtel (partner in LANS) and Shaw Group Inc (the 'S' in KSL) have come under intense investigations in connected with the Katrina cleanup.

Think about it for a moment. Bechtel, KBR, and Shaw - all companies with ethical problems. And now, all three are involved in the day-to-day operations at LANL.

It appears that privatization has opened LANL's doors to the wolves."

And that is exactly what happened. A complete rip-off the of the US taxpayers, tremendous damage to the complex, moral at an all time low. Way to go. However a number of managers have made out very very well. How do they feel now that it is clear that it was just a giant con game all along? 

Comments

Anonymous said…
It was run with pristine holiness when UC ran it!! It was actually divine intervention.

Sounds like someone who had it good for so long and now is about to lose it all because you were all so blind.

POS
12/16/2014 9:56 AM
Anonymous said…
POS

December 16, 2014 at 9:56 AM

Great, POS if of the his meds again. We have to listen to his drivel for a week or so before there is an intervention and he is forced to back on the mass of psychotropics.
12/16/2014 7:40 PM
Anonymous said…
Is it safe to say that The University of California did a better job at running LANL than LANS; and for less money? Hello, anybody?
12/17/2014 4:31 AM
Anonymous said…
If you were there, you know that UC didn't "run" anything. It gave LANL its benefits package and HR policies, and then disappeared for decades. When it reappeared around the time of Wen Ho Lee, it was shocked, shocked! to find the LANL management had screwed up do badly.
12/17/2014 7:49 AM
Anonymous said…
The only significant evidence that UC was involved with LANL in the 90's is that new employees had to swear allegiance to a flag with a bear on it.
12/17/2014 3:22 PM
Anonymous said…
test
12/19/2014 7:16 PM
Anonymous said…
If you were there, you know that UC didn't "run" anything. It gave LANL its benefits package and HR policies, and then disappeared for decades.

December 17, 2014 at 7:49 AM

I rest my case!
12/21/2014 3:30 AM
Anonymous said…
If you were there, you know that UC didn't "run" anything. It gave LANL its benefits package and HR policies, and then disappeared for decades.

December 17, 2014 at 7:49 AM

I rest my case!

December 21, 2014 at 3:30 AM

Indeed and that is why we lost the cold war and the labs where such failures for past 50 years. Thank god we changed that and things are soo much better now. We can all agree how horrible it was when UC was in charge and how much better the nation is now that we are run by a greedy and corrupt corporation. This makes total sense.
12/23/2014 7:49 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Rumor corner

By scooby
LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
92 comments
Read more