It is just the day in and day out safety and security issues at LANL that keep on coming.
http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/02/f19/DOE-IG-0935.pdf
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
9 comments:
Insignificant. Unfortunate but not unexpected in the confusing, often imprecise world of classification. People trying but failing to follow complex practices is different than treason.
Fix it. Move on.
Wow! Would hate to see what 7:46 PM calls 'significant.' No reasonable person in the area would call repeated release of classified information 'not unexpected.' The investigation found that LANL had numerous such lapses. Therefore commonplace for LANL; however, hardly 'insignificant.'
Yeah, well, no one held accountable, the guy got to retire at full pension, no questions asked. Obviously LANS and NNSA think it is "insignificant."
Errors happen. Overall, Dan probably made fewer than most.
Errors happen. But when they do, they should be reported, not covered up by lying, by deleting files, and by bypassing the proper clean-up procedures. Its all in the report. And, management knew he was doing this and continued to let him hold the Classification Officer position.
Errors happen. But when they do, they should be reported, not covered up by lying, by deleting files, and by bypassing the proper clean-up procedures.
February 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM
Yeah, or by hiding them (i.e. hard disk) behind a copier in X-division in the old Administration Building.
Nobody "hid" a hard disk behind the copy machine. Get your facts straight.
Nobody "hid" a hard disk behind the copy machine. Get your facts straight.
February 18, 2015 at 3:27 PM
Ok, it was "placed" behind a copier for everyone to find it.
Ok, it was "placed" behind a copier for everyone to find it.
February 18, 2015 at 5:02 PM
Wrong twice. Not swayed by facts, huh?
Post a Comment