Skip to main content

Incident version B

Los Alamos National Laboratory just issued the following memo to employees regarding an incident that occurred today at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE):

To employees regarding injuries at LANSCE

This is an informational memorandum from the Los Alamos National Laboratory Communications and Public Affairs Office:

On Sunday (May 3), during preventive maintenance operations at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE), a Laboratory employee was burned while working at an electrical substation. The employee was transported offsite for medical treatment and is listed in critical condition.

Eight other employees were also transported to Los Alamos Medical Center in connection with the accident; seven of those employees were later released, and one employee remains at LAMC for observation.

The cause of the accident is under investigation.

Due to ongoing activities to ensure the continuing safety of the workforce and facilities, numerous areas at LANSCE are without power and will remain without power until further notice.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Work was being conducted over the weekend. There were three identical looking ~ 12 kV substation electrical boxes. Worker opened the wrong box to clean which was "live". He sprayed conductive "cleaner", electrical discharge, worker's clothes caught on fire. Another worker (a woman) was able to extinguish fire on him. Worker air lifted to Albuquerque with major burns to face and upper torso. Some issues related to whether the worker was an "unqualified" electrical worker or "lineman".

Anyone care to elaborate or clarify? This is what were told out at TA-55.
Anonymous said…
May 12, 2015 at 5:20 PM

The other labs in the DOE complex are getting much more information about what happened at LANCE. Funny that we are getting so little information. LANL is a truly strange place.
Anonymous said…
What happened to lock-out tag-out? Really, LANS? Lans is more concerned with wearing shoes that grip than implementing a lock-out tag-out procedure on high-voltage equipment.
Anonymous said…
What happened to lock-out tag-out? Really, LANS?

May 13, 2015 at 5:40 PM

Why are you calling out LANS?? Obviously the WORKERS failed to implement lock-out tag-out. How is that LANS' fault??
Anonymous said…
Why are you calling out LANS?? Obviously the WORKERS failed to implement lock-out tag-out. How is that LANS' fault??

May 13, 2015 at 8:18 PM

Improperly or untrained workers working for LANS. Workers action are ultimately the responsibility of the company (LANS) they work for. LANS will settle this out of court, unwilling to expose their negligence.
Anonymous said…

Improperly or untrained workers working for LANS. Workers action are ultimately the responsibility of the company (LANS) they work for. LANS will settle this out of court, unwilling to expose their negligence.

May 14, 2015 at 5:41 AM

False, LANS does not own this. They cannot control everyone and are not expected to control everyone. Until all the facts come out we should speculate or monger.
Anonymous said…
Until all the facts come out we should speculate or monger.

May 14, 2015 at 8:52 AM

Of course we should, and we're doing exactly that!
Anonymous said…
False, LANS does not own this. They cannot control everyone and are not expected to control everyone. Until all the facts come out we should speculate or monger.

May 14, 2015 at 8:52 AM

Another poor LANS soul in denial.
Anonymous said…
Until all the facts come out we should speculate or monger.

May 14, 2015 at 8:52 AM

Facts? LANS is NOT in the business of releasing the facts, only following the money.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!