Skip to main content

Congressional hearings on LANL waste drum accident

Congressional hearings on LANL waste drum accident


Also on Friday, the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations will examine the oversight failures that contributed to a radiological incident that shut down the Department of Energy’s Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in 2014. Investigative reports by the Department of Energy completed this past April have revealed that proper oversight of operations at both Los Alamos National Laboratory and the WIPP site, both in New Mexico, could have prevented the incident and some of its consequences. Resumption of WIPP operations, necessary to dispose of certain waste forms from the nation’s nuclear weapons operations, has been estimated to cost upwards of $500 million. The hearing will also address questions of DOE’s system of oversight for contractors. The Majority Memorandum, witness list, and witness testimony will be available here as they are posted.

http://energycommerce.house.gov/press-release/look-ahead-committee-announces-hearing-schedule-week-june-8

Comments

Anonymous said…
Great witness list...nobody who actually knows anything. perhaps Congress could look into whether the DOE should continue...
Anonymous said…
Wonder when they will hold hearings about the disposition of 34 tons of surplus plutonium that was to feed the MOX plant? So much for contaminated tools, coveralls and stuff that they told the people of New Mexico was the purpose for WIPP.
Anonymous said…
It's ironic that LANS just announced they replicated an exploding drum in Laboratory "juiced" conditions. Just in time for Wallace and McMillan's interviews at the Congressional hearings. The timing of LANS scientific "breakthroughs" is impeccable. LANS will inform Congress of their "greatness" on Friday....to both Congressional members asleep at the table.
Anonymous said…
Yeah, I heard Terry Wallace requested that Chavez "juice" these mock experimental drums with HMX-based explosives with a remote detonator. Of course, they exploded!
Anonymous said…
He didn't add HMX-explosives! He only added the detonator! The nitrates with the organic kiddy litter is already an explosive mixture. Get it right!
Anonymous said…
Let's just say those so-called experiments won't have a peer review...fortunately!
Anonymous said…
Let's just say those so-called experiments won't have a peer review...fortunately!

June 13, 2015 at 8:28 AM

Peer review is for science and we no longer do that at the labs.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...