Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it. Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
Comments
Sandia has always been the "good lab" while LANL is is the problem child that needs to be beaten. Sandia has one scandal with of illegal lobbying, LANL: Wen Ho Lee, stolen mustangs, fires, disks behind copiers, culture of theft, cowboy culture, lab shut down, arrogant scientists, buttheads, meth and secrets, blowing up buildings, broken fences, WHIP, corrupt deputy directors, people who think they are better than others, more fires, stolen gold, drug testing, WHIP, blinding students with lasers, electrical fires, broken fences and it goes on and on.
I think it is clear that Sandia is not the leper child, but the good studious child that makes a mistake every once in awhile like we all do. LANL is the incorrigible delinquent, LLNL is the fat dumb kid that everyone picks on, NTS is the invisible child that never says anything. Oak Ridge is the child that has gone on the Ivy league and will soon start a job as an investment banker. DOE is the stern but fair father trying to deal with a large and diverse family. NNSA is the mentally disturbed mother on prozac.