Skip to main content

Clean up underfunded before new contract starts

http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/environment-department-lanl-cleanup-could-cost-b/article_be41efe6-40a5-53c4-af82-b101012c2418.html?utm_content=buffer7c192&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

Comments

Anonymous said…
A real reporter seeking to be impartial and unbiased would have tried to get a comment from the DOE regarding the basis of the $1.7B contract and why the NMED suggests that it is closer to $4B. Instead, we roll out the same tired anti-LANL people that we can predict with great accuracy their statement before they open up their mouth and speak falsehoods and their opinions in the name of newsworthy reporting.
Anonymous said…

No one cares what Greg Melo has to say, not DOE, not Congress and certainly not the state of New Mexico. If it costs 4B than it is great news for the state! If it cost 1.7B that is not bad but we could do better! As for Greg,? well ask your self this, after 15-20 years of his same talk what has he accomplished? Maybe he should shutting up for a change and things might go his way. Just saying.
Anonymous said…
One point of Blog unity is the absolutely worthless nature of Greg Mellow and Jay Coghlan. Neither of them have ever produced anything of value for the United States or for the State of New Mexico. They are champions of their own egos. Sadly, the Santa Fe press is more than happy to indulge them in their phony credentials and uneducated positions.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...