Skip to main content

Rick Perry for DOE secretary?

  1. Trump Considering Gov. Rick Perry As Energy Secretary
    -Had pledged to eliminate DOE during 2011 debate.

    http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2016/11/16/oh-irony-trump-considers-rick-perry-as-potential-energy-secretary/

    President-elect Donald Trump’s transition efforts are in full swing, and with them an ironic twist in regard to former Gov. Rick Perry.

    There’s discussion of Perry as a potential Energy Secretary, according to the Wall Street Journal.

    If that happens, it means Perry would head up the very department whose name he forgot — the Department of Energy — during a GOP debate in 2011. He had also pledged to eliminate the federal agency during that campaign.
    ReplyDelete
  2. comment:


    I think they asked what three agencies he would eliminate and could not remember the second one, Ron Paul was giving him some hints saying energy...energy. Of course Ron Paul also had no idea that NNSA was part of the DOE.

Comments

Anonymous said…
NNSA is not going away, but one could make a case for it being better situated in DOD, not DOE. If you take away NNSA, then you're left with a greatly shrunken DOE that is in fact somewhat ripe for being eliminated. At least re-focused and re-directed.
Anonymous said…
The DoD not DOE issue has been argued again and again since 1945. DoD has always lost. We want the nuclear weapon enterprise in civilian hands, always.
Anonymous said…
Perry is low life dog droppings. Dumber than Witch Hazel. Can't spell LLNL. Finslly. A fitting death for DOE.
Anonymous said…
The military already drives the priorities of the nuclear weapons enterprise, and military people are often in high positions in it. Alternatively, Trump could strip off everything in DOE that is not NNSA, and rename the department. But Perry can't be worse than some past secretaries. O'Leary and Richardson come to mind.
Anonymous said…
I think it is unlikely that Peery could be worse than O'Leary or Richardson but not a great choice.

>The DoD not DOE issue has been argued again and again since 1945. DoD has always lost. We want >the nuclear weapon enterprise in civilian hands, always.

Civilian hands yes, but not for profit hands.
Anonymous said…
NNSA is not going away, but one could make a case for it being better situated in DOD, not DOE. If you take away NNSA, then you're left with a greatly shrunken DOE that is in fact somewhat ripe for being eliminated. At least re-focused and re-directed.

November 19, 2016 at 1:52 PM


Sarah Palin said she wants the DOE/NNSA Secretary job, but that it would be a short-term assignment since she would "shut-down" DOE/NNSA.
Anonymous said…
NNSA is going to grow like a weed under Trump and the Republican Congress, wait and see. The rest of DOE, maybe not so much. I even hear talk about the possibility of a new test program.
Anonymous said…
Here's the real clear truth. The executive branch (i.e. President) can not do away with any part of the government established by the legislative branch (i.e. Congress). The US Congress would have to enact specific legislation to either eliminate or substantially change DOE. This is how NNSA came into being with the reorganization of the Office of Defense Programs. And no member of the congressional oversight or appropriations committees in either the Senate or House - republican or democratic - is going to do anything that cuts their power by reducing their specific committee's scope nor the budget it oversees or approves. This has always been the real reason DP (now NNSA) could not be moved from DOE to DOD. The Senate/House Energy committees are not about to give this big a chunk of their respective portfolios to their colleagues on the Senate/House Armed Services committees. Never.
Anonymous said…
Cherry Murray ! Much better choice.
Anonymous said…
You say Rick Perry doesn't have a clue what DOE is and what it does. That's the man we need at the helm, we don't want to change the tradition of a rudderless ship at this stage of the game do we? After all, the labs are still breathing and have a weak pulse.

OR

Bring back Hazel. She was one of a kind, the kind you hope they never make again.
Anonymous said…
Might be as well lead by a shoe.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!