Goldstein to lead UC bid for LANL!
Is this a joke?
Comments
I have heard a different name but Goldstein would make more sense than the name I have heard and Goldstein would lend some actual credibility to a bid team from UC. Than again maybe it is all bs. The blog seems to have the same level accuracy as the NYT and WSP when it comes to anonymous sources. Sorry Scooby I don't want to disparage the blog by making this comparison but I was just trying to make a point ;)
Scooby: your comment foes not bother because the blog isn't the WSJ or the NYT. 🙂
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
LLNS Contract discussion
SUGGEST NEW TOPICS HERE
Submit candidates for new topics here only. Stay on topic with National Labs' related issues. All submissions are screened first for ...
-
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will have a huge negative effect on the ...
-
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises t...
-
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref...
6 comments:
Bring back Parney!!
Anastasio, Mara, Knapp, McMillan, et al. showed the way to riches. Follow the money, and become the next Kalifornia Karpetbagger to run LANL into the ground, Bill.
I don't see why Bill would want to sign-on for a DOA proposal by UC. If Lock-Mart got thrown out of Sandia, how much doubt is there that UC rolls off the mesa?
Or can UC learn to promise as much as Honeywell?
Anothet boring troll. Any lab news?
LLNL zeroed in site splits.
Now NNSA just hired Younger, Girrens, and Burns to run Sandia into the ground. For anyone who really knew these three guys and the the way the operate just goes to show you how screwed-up NNSA is. NNSA just threw out hundreds of years of very experienced managers at Sandia to put the three stooges in charge. What an abomination!
Post a Comment