Skip to main content

Goldstein to lead UC bid for LANL!

Image
By scooby
Goldstein to lead UC bid for LANL!
Is this a joke?

Comments

I have heard a different name but Goldstein would make more sense than the name I have heard and Goldstein would lend some actual credibility to a bid team from UC. Than again maybe it is all bs. The blog seems to have the same level accuracy as the NYT and WSP when it comes to anonymous sources. Sorry Scooby I don't want to disparage the blog by making this comparison but I was just trying to make a point ;)

 Scooby: your comment foes not bother because the blog isn't  the WSJ or the NYT. 🙂

Comments

Anonymous said…
Bring back Parney!!
5/18/2017 5:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Anastasio, Mara, Knapp, McMillan, et al. showed the way to riches. Follow the money, and become the next Kalifornia Karpetbagger to run LANL into the ground, Bill.
5/19/2017 3:33 PM
Anonymous said…
I don't see why Bill would want to sign-on for a DOA proposal by UC. If Lock-Mart got thrown out of Sandia, how much doubt is there that UC rolls off the mesa?

Or can UC learn to promise as much as Honeywell?
5/19/2017 9:28 PM
Anonymous said…
Anothet boring troll. Any lab news?
5/21/2017 11:52 PM
Anonymous said…
LLNL zeroed in site splits.
5/25/2017 3:11 PM
Anonymous said…
Now NNSA just hired Younger, Girrens, and Burns to run Sandia into the ground. For anyone who really knew these three guys and the the way the operate just goes to show you how screwed-up NNSA is. NNSA just threw out hundreds of years of very experienced managers at Sandia to put the three stooges in charge. What an abomination!
6/01/2017 3:51 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

LLNL un-diversity

By scooby
Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
79 comments
Read more