Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Monday, July 17, 2017

NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018



R E P O R T

[TO ACCOMPANY S. 1519]

ON TO AUTHORIZE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 FOR MILITARY ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, AND FOR DEFENSE ACTIVITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, TO PRESCRIBE MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTHS FOR SUCH FISCAL YEAR, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES TOGETHER WITH ADDITIONAL VIEWS COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE

p.39

USS Los Alamos

The committee notes that 2018 will be the 75th anniversary of Los Alamos National Laboratory. The committee further notes that people of Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Navy, have a 74-year relationship that spans the Manhattan Project through the creation of a nuclear Navy and to the sea-based leg of the strategic nuclear triad of the United States. The people of Los Alamos and surrounding communities have contributed to the Navy’s offensive edge since World War II, through the Cold War, that continues today. The committee believes that naming a submarine USS Los Alamos will recognize and continue to forge the longstanding relationship between the Navy and Los Alamos. Therefore, the committee urges the Secretary of the Navy to name the next nuclear-powered fast attack submarine the USS Los Alamos.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...



Nanos is freaking out. " I personally rammed Los Alamos into an iceberg at full speed in order to sink it, I blamed the crew, and threw them overboard, I had to destroy the village in order to save it, and now just to scorn and mock me they they are naming a naval warship after Los Alamos!!!"

Anonymous said...

Nanos is the enemy.

Anonymous said...

Congratulations to Los Alamos. A great honor. A great place in history.

Anonymous said...

That's funny. Always heard that the Navy hates LLNL I guess a USS Livermore was out of the question. Good luck with your crappy LANL W-88's in those silos!

Anonymous said...

LLNL tried to force the Navy to use IHE and they didn't respond well to that.

Anonymous said...

LLNL tried to force the Navy to use IHE and they didn't respond well to that.

July 22, 2017 at 7:56 AM

In the end what LLNL wants LLNL gets because LANL is the problem child, LLNL is the golden child.

Anonymous said...

In the end what LLNL wants LLNL gets ...

July 22, 2017 at 8:03 AM

Including LANL designs.

Anonymous said...

Good luck with your crappy LANL W-88's in those silos!

July 19, 2017 at 12:44 PM

So far (30-years) and no problems. Incidentally, it's a W88/Mk5 and they are not in silos, they are in missile tubes aboard SSBN submarines around the world.

Anonymous said...

So far (30-years) and no problems. Incidentally, it's a W88/Mk5 ...

July 25, 2017 at 3:58 AM

To put it into perspective, this is like the US going into World War 1 armed with Civil War weapons.

Anonymous said...


To put it into perspective, this is like the US going into World War 1 armed with Civil War weapons.

July 29, 2017 at 7:28 AM

I was thinking more like hot air ballon combat.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days