From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use. touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
Comments
Wow, the issue is that if LANL cannot do pits than why have LANL? Of course who else could do pits and why would they do them any better than LANL. One thing we now for sure is that Charlie McMillin was NOT fired, he left when he decided he wanted to leave and he was double plus good.
Some news
There is something on NNSA site that they are not going to budge on the fee amount being at 30 million. So that is a big disappointment for the county. It also increases that odds of more service oriented operators rather than the profit raiders. I have also heard something about Leidos being interested.
U Texas is also ramping up for a a bid.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/UT-System-prepares-Los-Alamos-bid-to-manage-U-S-12221340.php
The University of Texas System is pursuing what would be its biggest out-of-state contract in history as it prepares a bid to manage the Los Alamos National Laboratory, the facility responsible for the safety and reliability of the country's nuclear weapons.
Of course they have to get quotes from the usual crowd. Mello has a slight amount of credibility but why on earth would they ask a phony hack like Glen Walp? In any case U Texas would have also FIRED that guy. They could have at least mentioned that he was FIRED from LANL to give readers a heads up on what they are dealing with. Maybe Walp wants Walden University to manage the lab.
"Two Los Alamos observers who have criticized historical operations said the UT System has a fair chance to earn the facility's contract. Many entities that have shown interest in the facility are corporate, and the UT System as a manager could convey prestige, they said.
Neither expected UT to be able to fully solve the facility's problems, though.
Challenges at Los Alamos stem from its remote geographical location, mission, corporate influence and culture of secrecy, Mello said.
The reputational challenge, he said, "has roots deeper than any change of management."
Corporate influence within a management entity can create a culture too focused on profits, said Glenn Walp, a former lab investigator who uncovered millions of dollars of missing equipment and financial abuses. But it would be very difficult for a university to manage facility and production operations without corporate involvement, he said."
I do not see a big pool right now...