Skip to main content

Regional Coalition of LANL Communities’ use of public funds flagged



http://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/regional-coalition-of-lanl-communities-use-of-public-funds-flagged/article_b4f59a44-9440-595f-87fa-c64187479eca.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
so, what do we have here? The DOE funds, to the tune of 100K per year, an organization called "regional coalition of LANL communities" with an annual budget of 212K. The executive director salary consumes 2/3 of this budget. This organization leads the lobbying effort for the state of New Mexico to tax nonprofit operators of Los Alamos National Laboratory. In the midst of a contract competition run by the DOE, no less. The DOE then pays 100M to the state of New Mexico in gross receipt tax...

I see trees of green, red roses too
I see them bloom for me and you
And I think to myself what a wonderful world
Anonymous said…

"four Birra Moretti beers that cost $8"


Dang, 8 bucks will get a six pack of this cheap Italian beer. What a crime.

Seems like some people has been having some issues with travel reimbursements .
Anonymous said…
Northern NM politicians = corruption. No surprise here.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...