Skip to main content

Omega’s funding restored

Image
By scooby
Omega’s funding was restored and increased:

https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2018/03/22/omnibus-bill-restores-funding-ur-laser-lab/446329002/

Does anyone know what happened to NIF’s funding in the omnibus bill?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Omega's funding cuts and closure are to start in FY19, not FY18, so closing LLE was never part of this bill. The increase in funding from 68 to 75 million is what they were hoping for, and serves as ammunition in the upcoming battle over closure - look, you gave us an increase in FY18, but now you want to start shutting us down in FY19?
3/25/2018 9:01 AM
Anonymous said…
"Schumer said the funding ensures that LLE scientists and engineers stay on the job, "keeping our nuclear weapon stockpile safe and reliable while pushing the frontiers of energy research at a time when countries like China and Russia are working to beat the U.S. to new technological advances.”"

What B.S. from Senator Schumer. LLE has precious little to do with Stockpile Stewardship and contributes nothing meaningful to fusion research today. All work at LLE is unclassified !
3/27/2018 8:55 PM
Anonymous said…
Such profound ignorance: "LLE contributes nothing meaningful to fusion research".

They only contribute 80% of ICF/HED experiments, development of most experimental platforms, and a chunk of the workforce training.

Congress did the right thing for FY18, but they need to follow through for FY19 and beyond.

SSP would suffer badly without LLE/OMEGA. In 20 years you'd notice their absence much more than that of NIF.
3/29/2018 6:59 PM
Anonymous said…
"SSP would suffer badly without LLE/OMEGA. In 20 years you'd notice their absence much more than that of NIF"

Sorry, I don't buy it, and I was there. LLE cannot contribute to HED experiments that are relevant to weapons, unless LLE personnel are working at LLNL and get Q-clearances. Omega is an unclassified facility. Omega in all it's forms is a Nova class laser. Not enough UV energy to do meaningful direct drive. Shut it down. Spent the money at NIF. Do Polar Direct Drive at NIF with the LLE money if you want to be relevant.
3/29/2018 10:12 PM
Anonymous said…
Nonsense. LLE contributes very little of it's own ideas to fusion research, and almost nothing outside hardware development that could be done elsewhere, for example at the NIF. NLUF is important, but that could be folded into NIF too, especially if NIF streamlines and simplifies to boost it's shot rate.
3/30/2018 8:45 AM
Anonymous said…
A lot of the EOS work, particularly x Ray diffraction, was developed at Omega first for cost reasons. I’ve had NIF physicists tell me they would never have had their stuff work had they not gone to Omega first. It often takes hundreds of Omega shots to develop a platform. The recent papers LLE has put out EOS has been groundbreaking stuff.
3/30/2018 4:25 PM
Anonymous said…
These comments smack a little of resentment (jealousy?) on the part of the labs. Maybe because LLE is hiring people away from them? Livermore isn't the "Mecca" for top scientists in this field anymore.
3/31/2018 2:15 PM
Anonymous said…
"Livermore isn't the "Mecca" for top scientists in this field anymore."

A few Livermore colleagues have joined LLE. Good for them ! LLE would not exist if it were not for Livermore's push over the last 4 decades for high energy, high power, large aperture laser systems for fusion research, and the necessary laser science and optical engineering to support it. Let's get real here.
4/02/2018 10:17 AM
Anonymous said…
April 2, 2018 at 10:17 AM knows lots of talking points but apparently no science.
4/02/2018 8:27 PM
Anonymous said…
Well 10:17 AM has a point, but it's not 4 decades. The current Omega laser is almost 25 years old, and has been firing routinely for most of that time, so there go 2 of those decades. A period where LLNL mostly had no large laser facility, Nova having been shut down and NIF being under construction. There were important early contributions from LLE to laser fusion research, like SSD and 3rd harmonic and some spectroscopic techniques, but by the time they got their 24 beam laser operating, LLNL had already gone through several big lasers and was operating Shiva. As LLNL went towards indirect drive and LLE continued with direct drive, their paths diverged. They've never had a strong computational physics team, either.
4/03/2018 1:42 PM
Anonymous said…

"April 2, 2018 at 10:17 AM knows lots of talking points but apparently no science"

Apparently you don't know any science, particularly laser science. Livermore has been the lead DOE laboratory for large aperture, high energy, high power laser science and optical damage science for over 4 decades, and this continues to this day on NIF, and international collaborations on design, modeling and building of high average power, high repetition rate picosecond lasers. I don't need to write five paragraphs here.

1975 to 1987 Laser Program Annual Reports (UCRL-50021-yr), 1988 ? 1989 ?
1990 to 2017 Laser Science and Technology Program Reports (UCRL-ID-142744-yr)

2017 - 1975 = 42 years > 4 decades (Cyclops, Argus, Shiva, Nova, Novette, Beamlet, and NIF)

>2 Mega joules on target in the UV at peak powers of 500 TW, with bandwidth and beam smoothing.
4/03/2018 8:20 PM
Anonymous said…
April 3, 2018 at 8:20 PM

Funny, your response also contains no science. Just talking points. Do you actually have any technical knowledge?
4/04/2018 9:13 PM
Anonymous said…
April 3 forgot to mention the billion bucks wasted on Teller's Toy, the x-ray laser.
4/11/2018 3:42 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

By scooby
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
96 comments
Read more