LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
Comments
The real and perceived failures at Los Alamos prompted the contract change for them and Livermore. LANL had their contract changed a year before Livermore so those in California can get a view of the boulder coming down the hill before it hits them.
And face it, most of the drama and juicy gossip happens at LANL. There were many a time when I was looking at the old LANL blog and I would say "You've got to be kidding me." When it comes to office back stabbing, security failures and technical boondoggles, I tip my hat to the folks in New Mexico. Livermore sure isn't an innocent in these matters but LANL is the expert.
April 10, 2018 at 4:33 PM
To be fair to LANL, a lot of this has to do with it being in New Mexico. Sandia also has some crazy stuff as well, it is just the nature of the state.
April 10, 2018 at 8:45 PM
Agree!!!
Agreed, the natives (a large majority) have no business working at Nuclear Weapons Labs ...give New Mexico back to Mexico.
At least it checks the box for diversity.
April 12, 2018 at 2:16 PM
LANL needs a competent, scientifically respected, politically attuned, personally well-adjusted new Director. Unruly, uncontrolled egos (i.e., "Tomas" - why does everyone call him by his first name? It is kind of a creepy homophilia) are not qualified. Just be normal psychologically, stable in denmeanor, well-spoken, and calm in crises. No such people exist in the national labs' retinue? That is very sad and frightening.
April 18, 2018 at 8:06 PM
They do still exist (Bob Webster for example) but the director position is now a political position if you haven't noticed so you must be a sociopath as a pre-qualification.