Skip to main content

Women and Minorities in STEM Are Discriminated Against

"Study Finds Women and Minorities in STEM Are Discriminated Against, to the Shock of No One"

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vice.com/amp/en_us/article/8xvvya/study-finds-women-and-minorities-in-stem-are-discriminated-against-pew-research-center-tech-science

Comments

Anonymous said…
This “study” was nothing more than a collection of poorly tabulated opinions.
Anonymous said…
2/19/2020 6:14 AM

The questions are like " Do you feel you have been unfairly denied a promotion" which find that 50% of women say yes. Did they ask the same question to men? If it is also 50%? Almost all the questions have this same issue.

These Pew research studies are either poorly done or have an agenda.
Anonymous said…
Now ask men if they have ever been denied a promotion because they are male. Apples and oranges 7:29 AM.

Anonymous said…


"Now ask men if they have ever been denied a promotion because they are male. Apples and oranges 7:29 AM.

2/20/2020 1:24 PM"

No it is not because you have to assume why you where denied a promotion. The question is do you feel you where unfairly denied a promotion and 50% said yes, and some assumed that it was because they are women but they actually do not know. Now they should also ask the men the same questions suppose they get 50% of men said yes. You could also ask why and they can only assume certain reasons but again they do not know. Look this is not that hard to understand, you need some kind of control when you do these kinds of studies. This is one of the reasons for the so called "reproducibility crisis" that is so prevalent in social sciences.



Anonymous said…
"These Pew research studies are either poorly done or have an agenda."

An agenda? Perhaps, but agendas are not limited to diversity research studies. There is not much that is organic about diversity and inclusiveness at the Labs. To a large degree, Lab diversity efforts are a construct required of federal contractors and are monitored by the OFCCP. Annually, the Labs generate diversity reports, recommendations, and goals called an Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) which are examined by the OFCCP, not an option for the Labs. The AAP has Lab support as noted by the plethora of Lab management signatures. Lab minorities who had voiced their own discrimination concerns are often promoted to diversity managers and become the point of contact for OFCCP encounters. As to the past diversity concerns of newly promoted diversity managers, those were just misunderstandings taken out of context you see. Use caution with the word agenda because there is plenty to go around.
Anonymous said…
On purpose or not. Are you talking about quotas?
Anonymous said…
"Now ask men if they have ever been denied a promotion because they are male. Apples and oranges 7:29 AM."

How would women or men know the reasons they where denied a promotion? They just have to take guess as to why. By the how many did they ask? I think you would need at least 500 people of either gender to proper statistics. How where the questions asked, where they leading questions act. Pew research is generally very low quality in terms of actual statistics and analysis. This may be deliberate to get the narrative they want.

Anonymous said…
I have definitely been denied a promotion because I’m not female. In every State except California, that is the same as being denied a promotion because I am male.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!