Skip to main content

Virtual Nuclear Weapons Design

Article on nuclear weapons simulations with lots of hyperbole:

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/virtual-nuclear-weapons-design-and-the-blur-of-reality/

Comments

Anonymous said…

Now this is some disturbing news.
Anonymous said…
A problem created by politics that could be undone with the stroke of a pen. Interesting article, however.
Anonymous said…
This article does not ring true. It refers to Dr. Adam Luft, a senior weapons designer at Los Alamos. There is no such person, past or present. It refers to new codes not being tested. Modern codes receive extensive verification testing and comparison with each other and with legacy codes. They are validated by data from 1054 nuclear tests and a much larger numbers of hydro tests and small scale experiments. The RAVE immersion visualization laboratory is rarely used by designers, and is mainly used to impress VIP visitors.
Anonymous said…
2/18/2020 8:54 PM

Who is Adam Luft? Perhaps he is so high up that we don't know about him.
Anonymous said…
Wow, there is no Luft at LANL. Just checked the directory. Article must be a fabrication.
Anonymous said…
You all might actually read the article to discover that “Luft” is a pseudonym.
Anonymous said…
You all might actually read the article to discover that “Luft” is a pseudonym.

2/19/2020 5:49 PM

Hmm, now who could Luft possibly be? Thats a tough one as I cannot think of single opinionated senior designer who thinks he knows best and likes to let everyone know it. Wow what a mystery.

Ok to fair the person has a point.

Anonymous said…

There has been talk that some people have seen Luft, or least heard of his existence. There are others like him but it is sort of like the movie Dune with the navigators.
Anonymous said…
That’s right, it’s noted at the end. They should have used a more creative name like Fetuccini.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.