Skip to main content

Virtual Nuclear Weapons Design

Article on nuclear weapons simulations with lots of hyperbole:

https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/virtual-nuclear-weapons-design-and-the-blur-of-reality/

Comments

Anonymous said…

Now this is some disturbing news.
Anonymous said…
A problem created by politics that could be undone with the stroke of a pen. Interesting article, however.
Anonymous said…
This article does not ring true. It refers to Dr. Adam Luft, a senior weapons designer at Los Alamos. There is no such person, past or present. It refers to new codes not being tested. Modern codes receive extensive verification testing and comparison with each other and with legacy codes. They are validated by data from 1054 nuclear tests and a much larger numbers of hydro tests and small scale experiments. The RAVE immersion visualization laboratory is rarely used by designers, and is mainly used to impress VIP visitors.
Anonymous said…
2/18/2020 8:54 PM

Who is Adam Luft? Perhaps he is so high up that we don't know about him.
Anonymous said…
Wow, there is no Luft at LANL. Just checked the directory. Article must be a fabrication.
Anonymous said…
You all might actually read the article to discover that “Luft” is a pseudonym.
Anonymous said…
You all might actually read the article to discover that “Luft” is a pseudonym.

2/19/2020 5:49 PM

Hmm, now who could Luft possibly be? Thats a tough one as I cannot think of single opinionated senior designer who thinks he knows best and likes to let everyone know it. Wow what a mystery.

Ok to fair the person has a point.

Anonymous said…

There has been talk that some people have seen Luft, or least heard of his existence. There are others like him but it is sort of like the movie Dune with the navigators.
Anonymous said…
That’s right, it’s noted at the end. They should have used a more creative name like Fetuccini.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!