Skip to main content

Funding awards

Image
By scooby
The Ed Moses’ cancelled LIFE idea has been resurrected at LLE Omega:

https://www.rochester.edu/newscenter/two-lle-scientists-awarded-doe-funding-for-fusion-research-426092/

Seems Ed deserves an apology and recognition for pioneering laser-driven fusion reactors for electricity generation.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Seems Ed deserves an apology and recognition for pioneering laser-driven fusion reactors for electricity generation.

Dear Ed, please forgive us.
5/10/2020 1:08 AM
Anonymous said…
It’s amazing how LLE Rochester, which was slated for cancellation a couple of years ago, was able to regurgitate a discredited idea from NIF and use it to get $$$. Who is the program manager an ARPA-E who couldn’t even see this con job? With budget cuts coming I expect LLE to be on the chopping block again, even with the support of Sen. Schumer. I’m sure the real National labs are tired of $80 million going to LLE for an upstate NY welfare program.
5/10/2020 8:50 AM
Anonymous said…
The article doesn’t even mention Moses, nor does it imply he was mistreated for the ongoing sham he created.
5/10/2020 9:06 AM
Anonymous said…
https://arpa-e.energy.gov/?q=about/profiles/dr-scott-hsu
5/12/2020 1:07 AM
Anonymous said…
The LLE award, and the ARPA-E program it falls under, has nothing to do with LIFE. It's about supporting small scale innovative fusion concepts, not ICF. Maybe read something about the context first.
5/16/2020 4:17 PM
Anonymous said…
Context? Moses and Miller propose using ICF to generate electricity. It is widely panned, discredited, and cancelled by Knapp in 2014. Now LLE proposes to generate electricity using ICF at energies less than 1 MJ. Doesn’t this sound similar? ICF, fusion energy for electricity generation. LLE has resurrected a discredited idea for electrify generation. In fact, because they are proposing a purely fusion scheme, not the fusion-fusion of LIFE, they should be criticized even more harshly as the requirements are more difficult to reach. I’m sure they have the same issues such as how to get capsules to ignite at 1 Hz and how to extract the energy for electricity generation.
5/17/2020 9:20 AM
Anonymous said…
LLE ARPA-E award: Use laser ICF to generate fusion and ultimately electricity on the grid.
LLNL LIFE program: Use laser ICF to generate fusion and ultimately electricity on the grid.
5/18/2020 6:53 AM
Anonymous said…
Look up at noon. Fusion works. Only a matter of scale.
5/19/2020 8:30 PM
Anonymous said…
If you had the conditions on the sun, you wouldn't care about "scale."
5/21/2020 5:37 PM
Anonymous said…
Look up at noon. Fusion works. Only a matter of scale.

5/19/2020 8:30 PM

Indeed the moon is undergoing fusion.
5/21/2020 9:03 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

By scooby
From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...
96 comments
Read more