Here is the timeline of my Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Case # 20-16012,
"Anthony T. Rivera v. U.S. Department of Energy":
2-18-21: I file my "Opening Brief”
3-15-21: DOE requests and is granted an extension of time to file their
"Answering Brief”
4-21-21: DOE files their “Answering Brief”
5-12-21: I file my “Reply Brief” (which was optional)
5 comments:
Mr. Rivera's case may be legitimate or illegitimate. Having said this, the DOE OHA has shown their indifference to whistleblower employee cases in favor of the contractor in most cases. Take a look at the Sandra Black case that essentially required 3 Senators to compel the DOE IG to compel the DOE OHA their determination was incorrect, a determination that frankly, a 2nd grader could comprehend.
https://www.postandcourier.com/aikenstandard/news/srns-ordered-to-reinstate-fired-worker-remit-371-000-in-back-pay-damages/article_9595092f-cc26-5508-abbd-b1b8241bac7b.htm
The DOE and NNSA bureaucrats have decided to ignore their workforce at almost every level in favor of political expediency.
"The DOE and NNSA bureaucrats have decided to ignore their workforce at almost every level in favor of political expediency"
True, but only transparency of past events will bring compelling light to your point, and to that of likely future similar events.
Why doesn’t Rivera just post his incriminating LLNS docs on Youtube for all to see?
Why doesn’t Rivera just post his incriminating LLNS docs on Youtube for all to see?
8/03/2021 7:43 PM
Because someone who actually knows some facts might refute them online, thus embarrassing Rivera and his lawyers before trial?
Post a Comment