Skip to main content

Baby come back!

 Ridiculous: Sandia employee left for Apple, couldn't handle it for 6 months and came back to Sandia


https://fairygodboss.com/articles/from-big-tech-to-national-security-work-a-boomerang-employee-story

Comments

Anonymous said…
The burning question, did she get a discount on an I phone13 and a free subscription to Itunes?
Anonymous said…
There are lots of way to see this like Sandia people suck and cannot make it elsewhere. Apple sucks and no sane person wants to work there. This was just one persons experience at Apple and is just a singular personal story that depends on a specific set of conditions.

I suspect that the person had a good deal at Apple but wanted to live in Livermore and commute for the money but they had to make a decision between the two after 6 months of this.

"A typical day would see Marie through three-plus hours of commuting to and from the office"

You mileage may very but I doubt you can read much into this story other than one persons personal experience.




Anonymous said…
Her gender undoubtedly plays a huge role in her experience. At Sandia she must merely exist in order to excel at her job whereas at Apple she must excel for her job to exist. She’ll probably run Sandia in a few years. “Fairy God Boss” indeed.
Anonymous said…
Seems like she had/has a pretty laid back job at Sandia. Regardless of type of work is all about who likes you to take you back. This happens quite often at LANL, employees leave for more "interesting"(money) opportunities just to find they really have to work for the money then come back crying and managers like to play that stupid game and take them back even when there are other employees who are probably better fitted for the position. It happens at all levels from students to managers. "is not what you know is who do you know".
Anonymous said…

Baby come back, any kind of fool could see
There was something in everything about you
Baby come back, yeah, you can blame it all on me
'Cause I was wrong, and I just can't live without you
Anonymous said…

The posts by 7:26 AM and 1:27 AM are rather cynical but probably have elements of truth. With that I have known people who have left the labs for Google, Microsoft, and Wallstreet jobs and so on have done very well and have not retuned. The truth though is that these people where were pretty good and generally did not fit in that well with the labs. The are results driven people and and one of the posters pointed out that labs are more existence driven at this point rather then results. It is also true that you can have a pretty good living the labs with a very laid back work ethic. This is not everyone of course but the "who you know" is much more relevant than "what you know" which is somewhat true everywhere is just way more prominent at the labs.
Anonymous said…
"Her gender undoubtedly plays a huge role in her experience. At Sandia she must merely exist in order to excel at her job whereas at Apple she must excel for her job to exist. She’ll probably run Sandia in a few years. “Fairy God Boss” indeed."

Unfortunately you are essentially correct. If your an OFCCP defined "underutilized" minority with LLNS, you are in the catbirds seat in terms of promotions and rehires independent of performance or conduct. If your not categorized as an "underutilized" minority (male, female, or ethnicity referenced to job title) with LLNS, you are not protected against discrimination when it occurs.
Anonymous said…
Actually, the burning question is; how much higher was her salary when she was hired back in than when she left? A quick way to get that raise you deserve, but didn't get.
Anonymous said…

750k or more at Apple, 500k LLNL, upped to 600k to return.
Anonymous said…
The commute is now so much easier in that AMG S-class !

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!