Skip to main content

The importance of having tactical nukes

 Great article on the importance of having tactical nukes. Very interesting points about the utility of the B61.


https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2022/01/05/the_return_of_battlefield_nuclear_weapons_810660.html


Comments

Anonymous said…
The Chinese and the Russians have maintained "battlefield" nuclear weapons. They clearly don't believe that "there is no winnable nuclear war" or "nuclear weapons are only for deterrence," like the US does. Putin would use a small nuclear strike against advancing NATO troops in a second, because he can't counter a NATO advance with his own conventional forces.
Anonymous said…
1/06/2022 7:04 PM

As proven 65 years ago, Russia is perfectly capable of countering a conventional warfare advance.
Anonymous said…
3:14 Closer to 80 years ago, but who’s counting?
Anonymous said…
As proven 65 years ago, Russia is perfectly capable of countering a conventional warfare advance.

1/07/2022 3:14 PM

That was not Russia. That was he Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. It is a much different world now and Russia is much diminished from the old USSR. Putin knows he cannot advance directly against NATO with conventional forces. Just look at the numbers. It is very clear.
Anonymous said…
5:48, I suggest you look at articles on Putin’s “escalate to de-escalate” nuclear strategy. But I think you’re right, Putin would not invade a NATO country. Ukraine is not in NATO.
Anonymous said…


Some rumors of a possible war with Russia if Ukraine is invaded. A crazy one I heard was that Biden and Harris where not in Nevada to just attend the memorial service for Harry Reid but where really in Nevada to go over our latest weapons at Area 51 to be used against Russia.

Anonymous said…
1/10/2022 11:54 AM

You're right, it's crazy.
Anonymous said…
1/09/2022 8:19 AM

I'm fully aware of the “escalate to de-escalate” thinking. It's garbage, IMO. He'll only do that if he thinks NATO will not back of after he does.
Anonymous said…
Right about now it should be clear that localized ”defensive" deployment of tactical nukes might have some value. Just look at the 401k jitters.
Anonymous said…
You want tactical nukes to defend your 401k? Yeah, that'll happen. War will wipe out everyone's 401ks, bank accounts, and stocks. That's what war does, when the US is invaded, as it will be with Russia or China.
Anonymous said…
"You want tactical nukes to defend your 401k? Yeah, that'll happen. War will wipe out everyone's 401ks, bank accounts, and stocks. That's what war does, when the US is invaded, as it will be with Russia or China.

1/28/2022 5:29 PM"

Scooby have you ever considered that someone these anti war types ares Russians trolls? Do not let you platform be used to spread propaganda. I bet we have had numerous Russian trolls on this blog for some time promoting Trump or defending Russia.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.