Blog purpose

This BLOG is for LLNL present and past employees, friends of LLNL and anyone impacted by the privatization of the Lab to express their opinions and expose the waste, wrongdoing and any kind of injustice against employees and taxpayers by LLNS/DOE/NNSA. The opinions stated are personal opinions. Therefore, The BLOG author may or may not agree with them before making the decision to post them. Comments not conforming to BLOG rules are deleted. Blog author serves as a moderator. For new topics or suggestions, email jlscoob5@gmail.com

Blog rules

  • Stay on topic.
  • No profanity, threatening language, pornography.
  • NO NAME CALLING.
  • No political debate.
  • Posts and comments are posted several times a day.

Saturday, June 25, 2022

Russia’s Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons

 From the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies...


"Russia’s Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons and Its Views of Limited Nuclear War
Dr Sidharth Kaushal and Sam Cranny-Evans
21 June 2022

Russia’s nonstrategic nuclear weapons are designed to achieve deterrence and military success against a technologically superior opponent. They are unlikely to be deployed in Ukraine.

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia’s nonstrategic nuclear arsenal has come to play an increasingly important role in its defensive plans. The definition of nonstrategic nuclear weapons in Russian parlance covers weapons with a range of less than 5,500 km. Tactical nuclear weapons (TNW) are a sub-category of nonstrategic nuclear weapons that are limited in range, typically to 500 km.

Most such weapons are in the kiloton (kt) range. For example, the nuclear capable SSC-8 carries a 10kt warhead. Notably, some Russian missiles which fall into the category of strategic weapons, such as the Layner submarine-launched ballistic missile, are also capable of carrying low-yield warheads suggesting substrategic missions. Though it has been suggested that unlike the Soviet Union, Russia is willing to resort to nuclear first use and has lower nuclear thresholds, this is not quite right. The Soviets incorporated the early use of battlefield nuclear weapons into their planning for a war in Europe. Rather, Russian thinking differs from its Soviet predecessor in that it considers the possibility of limited nuclear use as part of efforts to inflict ‘unacceptable damage’ upon an opponent within the context of a coercive strategy. This is dissimilar to the Soviets who, though they held out the possibility of avoiding strategic exchanges between the Soviet Union and the US, assumed that even tactical nuclear use in
Europe would assume catastrophic proportions. For Russia, nonstrategic nuclear weapons are a controllable part of a framework for achieving both battlefield results and war termination."

https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/russias-nonstrategic-nuclear-weapons-and-its-views-limited-nuclear-war

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

The US "tactical" nuke stockpile is limited to low-yield versions of the B61 gravity bomb. Not a very "tactical" weapon.

Anonymous said...

It's working. The threat of Russian nuclear weapons has deterred the US from effectively intervening in Putin's slaughter of his neighbors.

Anonymous said...

America is the laughing stock of the world because of Trump and the regressives. These people are de-evolving back into apes. Many more will leave...then conservatives will kill each other.

Russia is laughing at us, Ukraine is laughing at us, San Marino is laughing at us, the entire world...everyone. The United States is over. We have no authority in this world, there is no reason anyone should pay attention to us. I want to be like the Green Day singer and renounce my citizenship so I can go and live in a free country that takes care of its citizens.

Anonymous said...

It's working. The threat of Russian nuclear weapons has deterred the US from effectively intervening in Putin's slaughter of his neighbors.

6/26/2022 11:48 AM

America is falling apart, I say we just go to war with Russia, either we win or If not then we will be around to see the GOP take over in 2024. Sounds like a win win to me.

Posts you viewed tbe most last 30 days