Skip to main content

Should we be prepared?

 

Anonymous

I like many others are very concerned about the future of the US. After Iowa tonight we might have to starting thinking about
possibilites. Should the labs be preparing to deal with a possible Trump presidency? It is not becoming a real possibility that
Trump could be president again and the there is talk about how the government will deal with this. This is driven by the fear that Trump will use the military for dictatorial take over.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-military-fears-rcna129159

"Now, bracing for Trump’s potential return, a loose-knit network of public interest groups and lawmakers is quietly devising plans to try to foil any efforts to expand presidential power, which could include pressuring the military to cater to his political needs"

Now presumably the labs will be part of this network. Or democracy is in jeopardy.
Hi
Also Europe is getting worried

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/14/world/europe-leaders-trump-concerns-intl-cmd/index.html

"When Trump came along it woke us up to the fact that the US might not always act in European interest, especially if it goes against American interest,” a senior EU diplomat told CNN. “It sounds naive saying it out loud, but that was the assumption a lot people made.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
OK, I'll play. What are the suggestions for the response by the Labs?

Go on strike?
Refuse to validate the stockpile?
Aim NIF at Mar-a-Lago?

If the OP is employed at one of the labs and the lab does not "do something", will they resign in protest?
Anonymous said…

What on earth is wrong with Iowa. I thought for sure they would have enough sense not to pick the Don. Do they realize they are voting for man with like 100 felony charges, 20 trials, and pushed an attempted coup? Is this nation insane? I shudder to think that such people work at the labs, the military, and the government. I would guess this is due the mass amount of fake news and uneducated people being unable distinguish real from fake news. I have been saying for years, that we need to clean up the internet, social media, and have a real definition of who is or is not a legit news source. We need some real consequences for people who spread fake news.
Anonymous said…
CNN and NBC, that explains it. You had your chance and categorically failed. Please stop pointing fingers, and deal with it.
Anonymous said…
“Do they realize they are voting for man with like 100 felony charges, 20 trials, and pushed an attempted coup?

Sorry, the “man” was not charged with or convicted of a coup or “insurrection”. When you can’t beat or match the “man’s” accomplishments, this is what happens. It didn’t use to be this way. Scary times.
Anonymous said…
"Sorry, the “man” was not charged with or convicted of a coup or “insurrection”."

What are you talking about Colorado and New Hampshire just threw him off the ballot for....insurrection. Remember that thing called Jan 6th? I know you only listen to Q-anon and Fox news, but let the adults in room run things.
Anonymous said…
“New data shows a surprising demographic has joined California’s exodus”

https://apple.news/AjOrwUbZBRxqTBxzhNds37g

Not exactly a “Basket of Deplorables”. I thought California was a blue state?
Anonymous said…
“New data shows a surprising demographic has joined California’s exodus”

https://apple.news/AjOrwUbZBRxqTBxzhNds37g

Not exactly a “Basket of Deplorables”. I thought California was a blue state?

1/17/2024 7:14 AM


Math is your friend. This is showing exactly the opposite of the claim.

I see this time and time again, some news article will say data shows some trend, but if you look at the data and take the next logical step, like the derivative, the integral, or ratio.

The same thing happens for crime statistics where some claim is made "this and this effect" when the data is actually showing the opposite. I have no issue with the average person not knowing being to to this but this is the LLNL blog so I would figure people would no some math.

Anonymous said…
“I have no issue with the average person not knowing being to to this but this is the LLNL blog so I would figure people would no some math.”

Kind words for an opposing opinion. Nice truly.

Do you believe there is not a net CA exodus “(blue states to red states) propelled by cost of living (taxes, home prices, etc.) , crime, and political changes over the last 10 to 20 years in CA?
Anonymous said…
1/18/2024 6:54 PM

https://apple.news/AjOrwUbZBRxqTBxzhNds37g

Look at the title of the article.
"surprising demographic has joined California’s exodus”"

Look at the data charts in the article...extrapolate the trends...think about it .

Now do you see why this it is the exact opposite of what the article is saying or implying?

Net exodus is not the point of the article.



Anonymous said…
“The same thing happens for crime statistics where some claim is made "this and this effect" when the data is actually showing the opposite.”

Maybe they’ll be offered careers as part of the NIF progress report media team. Got to keep the billions of dollars flowing in.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!