Skip to main content

The situation on the Korean Peninsula is very dangerous

 This article came out a week ago, one of the authors, Sig Hecker is a former LANL lab director.


https://www.38north.org/2024/01/is-kim-jong-un-preparing-for-war/

also this more positive rebuttal was published,

https://www.38north.org/2024/01/a-fundamental-shift-or-more-of-the-same-a-rebuttal/

Comments

Anonymous said…
Here's another article on that,

https://www.nknews.org/2024/01/kim-jong-un-is-daring-seoul-to-escalate-both-koreas-must-step-back-from-brink/
Anonymous said…
Another article:

https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15116340
Anonymous said…
Hecker wrote a 2023 book, Hinge Points: An Inside Look at North Korea's Nuclear Program, which goes into the history that led up to the present situation.

Hinge Points brings readers literally inside the North Korean nuclear program, joining Siegfried Hecker to see what he saw and hear what he heard in his visits to North Korea from 2004 to 2010. Hecker goes beyond the technical details―described in plain English from his on-the-ground experience at the North's nuclear center at Yongbyon―to put the nuclear program exactly where it belongs, in the context of decades of fateful foreign policy decisions in Pyongyang and Washington.

Describing these decisions as "hinge points," he traces the consequences of opportunities missed by both sides. The result has been that successive U.S. administrations have been unable to prevent the North, with the weakest of hands, from becoming one of only three countries in the world that might target the United States with nuclear weapons. Hecker's unique ability to marry the technical with the diplomatic is well informed by his interactions with North Korean and U.S. officials over many years, while his years of working with Russian, Chinese, Indian, and Pakistani nuclear officials have given him an unmatched breadth of experience from which to view and interpret the thinking and perspective of the North Koreans.

"Hinge Points is a must-read for any serious practitioner of foreign relations. Siegfried Hecker lays out a riveting narrative derived from his "man in the ring" experiences over several decades. His deep insights are highly relevant to the challenges deriving from a nuclear-capable North Korea playing out in real-time."―Vincent K. Brooks, General, U.S. Army (Retired)

"Written by a scientist who has actually walked around North Korea's nuclear complex, Hinge Points is a piercing analysis of the decades-long failure to curb Pyongyang's nuclear ambitions. With unparalleled mastery of both technical details and diplomatic complexities, Siegfried Hecker lays bare the history in a way that opens a future path to progress."―John Delury, Yonsei University

"With Hinge Points, Siegfried Hecker offers unique insights into North Korea' dangerous nuclear program. And no-one is better qualified to do so. Hecker has visited the North and talked with their nuclear experts many times―and has held their plutonium in his (gloved) hand."―William J. Perry 19th U.S. Secretary of Defense

"Unlike other physical scientists who have turned their hands to policy, Hecker understands the complexities without trying to reduce them to simple solutions. His frustration at the lack of progress with North Korea is palpable and a refreshing contrast to the tired cynicism of experts in Washington who believe that Pyongyang is a hopeless case yet refuse to adopt different approaches. One can only hope Hecker has another chance to visit North Korea to brighten the prospects for diplomacy."―Sharon Squassoni, Arms Control Today
Anonymous said…
You keep going on about this Hecker guy? Who is he?
Anonymous said…
https://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/people/siegfried_s_hecker

From 1986 to 1997, Dr. Hecker served as the fifth Director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Dr. Hecker is an internationally recognized expert in plutonium science, global threat reduction, and nuclear security.

Dr. Hecker’s current research interests include nuclear nonproliferation and arms control, nuclear weapons policy, nuclear security, the safe and secure expansion of nuclear energy, and plutonium science.
Anonymous said…
https://www.the-sun.com/news/10151194/kim-jong-un-putin-new-world-order-chilling-warning/

KIM Jong-un and Vladimir Putin have sent a chilling warning to the West as they vowed to form a "New World Order".

North Korea said it has agreed to further strategic and tactical cooperation with Russia as both countries ramp up a united front against the United States.
Anonymous said…
"https://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/people/siegfried_s_hecker

From 1986 to 1997, Dr. Hecker served as the fifth Director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Dr. Hecker is an internationally recognized expert in plutonium science, global threat reduction, and nuclear security."

I would take Pete Nanos any day over this Hecker guy.
Anonymous said…
On this general topic, in a court deposition recently Trump made some claims related to North Korea:

https://youtu.be/Up668eqzRXY?si=mSobX11CnhLWFL2T
Anonymous said…
The BBC had a nice article relating to this and putting it in context:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-68052515

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!