Skip to main content

American researchers achieve nuclear reactor breakthrough

 

Hello!

Any scientist in this blog, please explain to us why is this considered a breakthrough?

Much obliged.

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/american-researchers-achieve-nuclear-reactor-103015064.html

Comments

Anonymous said…
These are better references, from Argonne's web site and the original journal article:

https://www.anl.gov/article/when-its-hotter-than-hot-scientists-know-how-nuclear-fuel-behaves-thanks-to-new-research-from

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-024-01883-3
Anonymous said…
I'm not sure it is a breakthrough. It would depend on your definition of "breakthrough". It also doesn't seem to be a claim made by the authors of the work.
Anonymous said…
It is a materials discovery. That is long way to go from there to nuclear energy. It is nice but the headline is hype. I would figure by now that after 5-10 years of hype headlines, in science and there has been a lot in the last 10 years people would figure out just to ignore this stuff.
Anonymous said…
It is not a breakthrough. The people at Karlsruhe were doing experiments with other techniques on UO2 after Three Mile Island. What I want to know is at what temperature reactor fuel becomes liquid. We ALL thought that would be when UO2 melts at around 3138K. Three Mile Island showed us otherwise. UO2 dissolves into liquid metals when the metal melts, around 2000k for zirconium. Think salt and water. Salt melts at a much higher temperature than it dissolves into water.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...