Skip to main content

Rehoming nuclear weapons

 Our Nuclear Weapons Need a New Home

by Franklin Miller & Frank Rose,
Real Clear Defense, January 23, 2026

https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2026/01/23/our_nuclear_weapons_need_a_new_home_1160419.html

"The Energy Department is the Wrong Place to Manage Our Nuclear Stockpile.

Nuclear deterrence is once again central to U.S. national security. The relative calm of the post-Cold War world has been replaced by an era of dangerous competition with two nuclear armed adversaries. China is rapidly expanding and diversifying its nuclear forces. Russia is modernizing its strategic and non-strategic arsenal while integrating nuclear signaling into conventional operations. Emerging technologies—from cyber operations to artificial intelligence and space-based systems—are compressing decision timelines and increasing the risk of miscalculation.

Yet the U.S. nuclear weapons enterprise is organized for a different era.

At precisely the moment when speed, accountability, and delivery matter most, responsibility for the nation’s nuclear deterrent remains embedded within a large civilian department whose leadership incentives, culture, and political priorities are largely oriented toward domestic energy and environmental policy. The result is an institutional mismatch: a mission that demands singular focus is governed by a structure designed to balance competing objectives.

This is not primarily a question of leadership talent or commitment within the workforce. Nor is it a comment about the current leadership of the National Nuclear Security Administration: in fact, quite to the contrary. From all accounts, Administrator Brandon Williams and his deputy Scott Pappano understand the vital role of our nuclear deterrent and of the infrastructure on which it rests and are seeking to lead the enterprise in the right direction. But the problem is above them. Fundamentally, it is a question of institutional design, of attempts to rationalize where in the Federal government the responsibility for the nuclear weapons infrastructure belongs...

...We therefore call on the Trump Administration to create a new an institutional home designed to re-establish the nuclear weapons infrastructure purpose as the firm foundation on which our national deterrence policy should rest.

The National Nuclear Security Administration should be established as a stand-alone sub-cabinet agency, reporting directly to the President, with clear authority and a singular mission: delivering the U.S. nuclear deterrent. The moment calls for nothing less."

---------
Franklin C. Miller served for decades as a senior policy official in the Department of Defense and on the NSC staff. He was a member of the Mies-Augustine Commission and the Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States.

Frank A. Rose is a former Principal Deputy Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration, Assistant Secretary of State for Arms Control, a professional staff member on the House Committee on Armed Services, and a policy official at the Department of Defense.
---------

So what does everyone think ?

Comments

Anonymous said…
The current structure within complex lacks cohesion and competence. I left LANL and NNSA in 2019 once I saw the new management’s ineptness, willingness and priority to become an an employer and not producer for Government, cost no fee contract perfect gateway. Reality, world is a complex place and having one or a couple entity try to solve all or most problems is not feasible, lacks national security foresight, inefficient 21 century strategy. All sites seems burdened by excessive inefficiency, 10x bloat as scope is too large and don’t seem to have capability of becoming efficient, past point of any practical returns. Believe most sites needs to downsize and have government put contract in place that focuses on core competencies to maintain, throwing money at an institution weaknesses, creates more ineptnesses and inefficiency. I think paper starts discussion in right direction if US cares about security not job placement.
Anonymous said…
"sites seems burdened by excessive inefficiency, 10x bloat as scope is too large and don’t seem to have capability of becoming efficient, past point of any practical returns."

At LANL after COVID the place seemed to go into overdrive in terms of inefficiency .

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...