Historically, what is the legal consequence, for Federal Contractor
false testimony (under oath perjury risk) in ANY case involving the DOE OHA? Hint: basically zerol,
3 comments:
Anonymous
said...
If a LLNS DEI “superstar” was involved in any form of workplace misconduct, he or she would most definitely be protected by LLNS “circling of the upper level wagons” and a DOE/ OHA sh_t show apparatus of protection. Still true?
The former political “superstar” Eric Swalwell had “circled wagons” of protection until he didn’t. I wish those women the best. It’s likely many knew about Eric Swalwell’s alleged abuses for years and did nothing, other than perhaps enable his alleged abuses of power.
3 comments:
If a LLNS DEI “superstar” was involved in any form of workplace misconduct, he or she would most definitely be protected by LLNS “circling of the upper level wagons” and a DOE/ OHA sh_t show apparatus of protection. Still true?
That LLNS DEI superstar probably got a 15% retention bonus for all that “really important work” as the drunk leader phrased it.
The former political “superstar” Eric Swalwell had “circled wagons” of protection until he didn’t. I wish those women the best. It’s likely many knew about Eric Swalwell’s alleged abuses for years and did nothing, other than perhaps enable his alleged abuses of power.
Post a Comment