Skip to main content

Response from jwolford of SPSE! Thanks JW!

I encourage any member who's curious about the status of SPSE-UPTE to come to the general membership meeting next week. That way we can at least address your questions. In summary, SPSE is doing a miniature version of what LLNL is doing: reconfiguring itself to operate in the private sector.

We now operate under a completely different set of laws, and adjusting to this is not automatic. Despite collecting dues, SPSE is a member-run union, and there are a handful of members doing all the work. We're grateful to everyone who sends us good ideas, but what we really need now is a few interested members to get involved and act on them. In my opinion SPSE has succeeded best when a member with a passion for something gets involved, gets help, and gets it accomplished. As for status, you will see another Sentinel sometime soon. I know because I'm editing the thing. Sure, the web page needs updating. If this bothers you, then stop complaining and volunteer to help with it. JW

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sorry, not buying it.

SPSE had over a year to learn about the new rules. They did a poor job in their attempt to get employees to join and we all paid dearly for that.

Time to get a real union at LLNL, the glee club is too busy with their newsletter.
Anonymous said…
Hello jan 22 9:00PM

You are entitled to your opinion; you are also entitled to run for president of SPSE and run it better!
Stop whining and offer to help instead!
Anonymous said…
The facts speak for themselves - SPSE did not garner much support from rank and file.

Calling that "whining" goes a long way to explaining why SPSE failed to attract new members.
Eric said…
The real point appears to be that LLNL and LANL workers are unlikely to be effective in dealing with management unless they get together in a professional and effective way. Individual attempts, as was proved in the Northeast for 100 years by many individuals and then nascent unions, don't work.

So, the question is what organization can help the good employees of LLNL.

At the moment, I don't know the answer to this question.
Anonymous said…
Your kidding me right?

"The real point appears to be that LLNL and LANL workers are unlikely to be effective in dealing with management unless they get together in a professional and effective way.

There is no professional way to deal with idiots and corruption. Just look at Washington, DC. They think it's their country, not yours and tax the devil out of you to prove it. Then use those taxes to aid themselves and their pocketbooks.

Individual attempts, as was proved in the Northeast for 100 years by many individuals and then nascent unions, don't work.

I'd say the northwest had their act together and were perfectly correct in their actions and it may be time once again to set the record straight. Unions work very well when the masses join together and use force when need be to get their needs along with ousting those who defy them. The right to strike is also very effective when you work for a company that's trying to make a product, but LLNL and LANL don't have that in their contract, so you lose....
Anonymous said…
SPSE has been a huge failure. You can't put lipstick on this pig and make it look better.

It's time to find a better solution for worker rights at both LLNL and LANL.
Anonymous said…
How does a union raise fear with a compnay that doesnt have to make a profit, has an unlimited budget for lawsuits, and can drop people at will?

Perhaps the best we can do is wait it out(or leave) for 6 1/2 years, then try to pick a decent contractor next time.
Anonymous said…
Running with idea Jan 25, 1:14 had.

LLNL and LANL should be employee owned.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!