Skip to main content

What will 2008 bring

Much greater NNSA oversight.

Congressional Budget Report

One of the most interesting parts of the above 2008 Congressional Budget Request for the NNSA is contained in the "Site Funding Summary" starting on page 569. While the design laboratories and the rest of the NNSA complex show essentially level funding between 2006 and 2012, Washington DC Headquarters funding is anticipated to go from $348M in 2006 to $1,267M in 2012. The 2012 funding level for DC is about equal to the projected funding for SNL and greater than that anticipated for LLNL. Note the 44% funding increase from 2007 to 2008.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hey doobydew!

This defies logic! HQ's funding should be proportionate to site funding; if the sites funding is being cut, you would expect HQ funding to be cut too.
Those making decisions look out for themselves and care less about the mission or taxpayer!
Anonymous said…
I agree. We can see this mentality at LLNL where ULM gets the bonus checks, high pay and are RIF exempt. Personally I'd like to see the 17 pages of worthless bozo's gone by Monday morning 1/7/08.

How many of these clowns do you think are going to get RIF'd? Try (none)...and it'll only get better with time.
Anonymous said…
I guess a herd of retiring admirals is headed for NNSA in the near future. They don't come cheap.
Anonymous said…
These are the kinds of issues that we should keep in mind when we vote next October. Most of us think voting independent is a waste of vote and keep voting the usual republican or democrat.
The ONLY way thing can change is to vote independent!
Anonymous said…
Maybe Headquarters is getting ready to design RRW3 without us. This way they won’t have to call for a competition between LLNL and LANL?
Anonymous said…
NNSA's Complex Transformation identifies under Mission Highlights for LLNL: "LLNL will be a Center for Excellence for Nuclear Design and Engineering ..." (NNSA own word).
With no nuclear testing, no RRW, no significant nuclear material at LLNL after 2012, no Site 300 testing, this mission will keep a dozen or so LLNL scientists, engineers, and technicians employed. However, ULM will probably not need to be reduced.
Anonymous said…
"With no ..... Site 300 testing, this mission will keep a dozen or so LLNL scientists, engineers, and technicians employed."

Eventually, the testing done at Site 300 will be done at the NTS or at Los Alamos. LLNL employees will travel there as part of the "mobile" experimentation teams.
Anonymous said…
January 6, 2008 7:05 PM

Sounds like an exciting job. Any volunteers. Lets see, you'll get to travel to strange places, live in run down cheap hotels, transport all of your test equipment to and from the location, lots of air time, be away from your family, your kids will wonder who you are, meet people who you could care less about, work in unfamiliar places, work very long hours and a lot of over time, make less money and in the end probably get served divorce papers. Now that's a life I want to live, for a company that took my UCRP retirement and lied to me all during the process, would lay me off on a moments notice, has no loyalty to me and is now going to reduce my 401K benefits and probably take away medical so I have to work until I am 65.

Why would anyone want to come to work for LLNL and put up with this Bull knowing that at one time they had it all right here on site and gave it up to make more layers of unwanted and unnecessary management who will be sitting at home with their famaily while you do all the work and they take all the credit.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!