Skip to main content

Where is our money?

Image
By scooby
By anonymous:

As of 2/26, no 401(k) contributions to Fidelity have been made by LLNS for the 2/22 paycheck. Look at your transaction history, folks.
Deposits have historically been made on payday. The market has gained considerable momentum in the last two days with the D/J up almost 300 points. When pressed, payroll said it was a transfer "glitch" and wouldn't commit to the Friday rate. Where's our money? Where's the profit we've made had it been given to Fidelity on 2/22?

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Where's the profit we've made had it been given to Fidelity on 2/22?"

Well, today - down the toilet. Last I looked, the Dow was down about 276 points, give or take a few. Oh well!
2/29/2008 12:18 PM
Anonymous said…
The LANS service-based 401k contributions are made only once per year for the previous year. Only the employee and employer match are made each payday at Los Alamos. We got our 5.5% (for 20 yrs of service) on 1-31-2008 for pay earned for all of 2007. I wonder if this difference will continue after they complete the new BENVAL study.
2/29/2008 6:32 PM
Anonymous said…
Deposits made on 2/27, 5 days after expected date (employee contribution shown on pay stub dated 2/22). Never had a problem before, 401K deposits were made exactly when expected ever since LLNS took over and we started with the "new retirement plan." So what happened this time? Called Benefits on Tuesday 2/26, they said it was a "glitch", that it was being worked on, and that an email or Newsonline or Newsline article was being prepared to explain what happened, what the fix was, and why this wouldn't happen again. So far, I haven't seen any article or other communication about this, though the money did show up eventually at Fidelity (albeit 5 days late). Although the amount of growth of any one 401K account over the 5-day delay wouldn't really amount to very much, when applied across all the employee accounts, the delay could have resulted in a substantial windfall for wherever the money was sitting awaiting "the fix." Not that I suspect that anyone was making a bundle on the 5-day "float", but without hearing anything from LLNS (typical non-communicative nature, even after an explanation was promised), one might have cause to wonder.
3/01/2008 3:53 PM
Anonymous said…
I looked at the difference in what I got on the 27th versus what I would have gotten on the 22nd, and there's about a 2% difference in what I received. In other words, on average, I would have gotten about 2% more had the purchases been made on the 22nd. I'm waiting to hear the explanation for this one. Ought to be good. Didn't they screw up once before (pre-LLNS) and not deposit people's checks on time causing a lot of bounced checks, etc.?
3/02/2008 7:02 PM
Anonymous said…
It's also interesting to note that this supposed "glitch" only occurred to TCP-2 employees (i.e., those that receive any matching funds from LLNS' pockets).

TCP-1's 401k paycheck-only deduction contributions were deposited right on time.
3/03/2008 7:29 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more