Skip to main content

Berrylium exposure

Anonymously contributed:


Article

Does anyone know more details about what really happened?
Specifically - what buildings and was there any chance people working in nearby areas could have been exposed

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yeah, Machine shops and waste handling facilities are a good start! Although I understand that some poor secretary actually came down with the disease in an office that was near (but not too near) an area where beryllium was processed! It seem that the lab "Subject Matter Expert" (there is a contradiction in terms) sampled the shit out of the area but neglected to test the biggest filter (read - the office carpet)in her immediate vicinity! Another confirmed kill for Hazards Control! Nice work guys!

Oh yeah, someone apparently neglected to inform HC that 8 feet isn't the absolute service ceiling for beryllium dust in a turbulent industrial environment. GSE is going to absolutely rape LLNL/LLNS!
Frank Young said…
U.S. to Review Beryllium Safety at Livermore
The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California is set to face a federal investigation into its potentially unsafe handling of beryllium, a toxic metal used in producing nuclear weapons, the Contra Costa Times reported Sunday (see GSN, Feb. 4).

Federal inspectors are expected to examine beryllium work at the site in September, following an independent investigation last month.

The inspections came in response to five incidents in which Livermore employees made contact with the metal, sometimes without their knowledge. In one of the cases, the laboratory took five months to inform 178 contract workers that they had been exposed during a retrofit project in one facility.

A small number of people exposed to the material develop beryllium sensitivity, a condition that leads in up to two-thirds of cases to potentially lethal chronic beryllium disease. Some research has linked an increased likelihood of developing the disease with continued exposure to the metal after a person is diagnosed with sensitivity.

The U.S. Energy Department offers beryllium sensitivity checks to current and former employees. Between 50 and 60 personnel connected to one of the incidents have requested checks, and a small portion of those people have tested positive for sensitivity (Betsy Mason, Contra Costa Times, July 6).
Anonymous said…
Ok the real truth is that there are 26 lab workers that are Be sencitive and of thouse 26 2 are cronic Be. These are lab emploeies not GSE workers. I have heard there are at least 4 GSE workers that are Be sencitive. The people that came to investigate did not talk to any of the people how are afected. Not to much of an investigation if you ask me. I know because I am one of the Be sencitive LLNL workers.
Anonymous said…
What buildings were involved?
Anonymous said…
What buildings were involved?

The list keeps growing. The reality is that if you worked in a building that at any time did weapons work,you may have been exposed to Be.

Considering the PR, I would strongly recommend everyone request to be tested for Be. It doesn't take much to get compensated.
Anonymous said…
It doesn't take much to get compensated.


Yeah, I'll bet!
Anonymous said…
Compensated, sure...

How much is being fatally poisoned worth to me? Vs what LLNS/DoE thinks. Oh wait, I know how much they think I was worth.

I traveled to work for years via bus, breathing diesel fumes and lousy Livermore air. Was exposed to notable doses of carbon monoxide from generators placed just upwind of building air intakes. Worked in machine rooms that had sand build up on top of racks. Other rooms that were laden with dust left over from construction. The building coordinators claimed the places were clean and safe. Oh yeah.

Would bet good money I would test positive for Be. Fat lot of good any compensation would be now.
Anonymous said…
Crapload of worker exposure and cover-up documents at the LANL Blog. You might want to drop by and check them out!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!