Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it. Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!
Comments
And when did it ever run successfully? HR alone would counter the a "successful" reference.
Not....
ULM has already shown it's a bunch of brain-donors. Like the move to use a Microsoft e-mail service and forcing the shutdown of any alternate servers than what OpenLabNet offered.
Less security, less capability, harder to support in large scale, payware vs Open Source. For what gain?