Skip to main content

Share your reasons

Anonymous asked:
1) Why did you leave LLNL?
2) Why are you staying?
3) Are you better off?

Comments

Anonymous said…
I decided to pull the plug. I'd rather go out on my own terms instead of getting the "perp" walk out the gate like a common criminal. I'm a early career 200series that saw the writing on the wall. I hope I'm wrong for the sake of the many good people at the lab but it's really a shame to see what this transition has done. I've been lucky and I think I've landed well. I wish the same to the rest of the folks at the lab whether they stay or go. Best of luck.
Anonymous said…
I'm staying until they kick me out, to many years to give away and to old for the job market. For those of you who are young I say move on before it's to late. I would never recommend this pace to anyone since it has no defined pension plan and there's no real benefits. The young can do far better elsewhere and for a lot more money. Until the day comes when LLNL once again has what we had under UC I anticipate they'll have a hard time holding onto good people. The transition from UC to LLNS has successfully destroy the national labs and the nation indirectly. Good job DOE. You've done to America what we did to Russia in just eighteen months and all for personal gain just as any good CEO of a failing corporation would do. I hope the penalty's our congress and senate may soon implement for being a crook apply to you too.
Anonymous said…
I think LLNL is still a good place to come as a postdoc as there is still good science happening in pockets here so if you're sheltered from the politics, from the need to apply for funding, and from the need to grow your career within the lab, then you can have a good 2-3 years here, at a much higher than average postdoc salary, and then move on.

And that is why I'm moving on. After 3 years as a staff scientist I have grown tired of the politics, tired of the struggle against our own management to bring funding into the lab, and tired of how ineffectual EVERYONE has become as the daily gossip and talk of re-orgs and other pointless management exercises has taken over completely from the excitement over just getting the science done that apparently existed here 5-10 years ago. Since I've been offered a great position in industry, which I might well have taken even if there weren't so many problems at LLNS, I'm moving on to accelerate my career in a way that has become impossible for young scientists here at the lab. It's a position with more responsibility and a higher salary.

So many good scientists have left or are leaving at the moment actually that soon there won't be any good science happening at LLNL and my first point about postdocs will not be true.

I won't start my new position for another month but I'll be sure to come back here and post something about the differences once I've had time to absorb them. Could be 6 months to give an accurate assessment, I suppose. I don't expect completely green grass over on the other side!
Anonymous said…
I still have WFO funding and the science is going fairly well. However, when the right opportunity opens up I am done with LLNL. I see no benefit in working here other than a few of the people that still remain. The lab may turn things around, but who really cares? Its lost its soul and is now a poorly ran/managed job.
Anonymous said…
I got frustrated with my division manager's favoritism and treating us like robots. I left to work for humans and with humans and was actually surprised to get 15% raise and far greater benefits. I wish I could name names but it is against the BLOG rules!
Anonymous said…
I left for academia. Crappy pay compared to LLNL but the cost of living difference gives me more money at the end of the day.

Am I happy I left, yes and no. I am happy that I am, for all intents and purposes, my own boss and my schedule is my own (apart from 3 hours/week when I teach). No more of this 'hero' BS where if ou were the fovorite of the managers you moved places regardless of performance or value.

The flip side is I liked the work I did. Just did not like the politics and what I perceived as, unfair merit raises..
Anonymous said…
I left COMP because it is filled with clans. If you are part of the clan, you advance. If you are not, you will be stuck where you are.
Someone mentioned his/her division manager treated people like robots.
That person is right!
Time for the S&T PAD head to take a closer look and see for themselves!
Anonymous said…
I agree with '76', LLNL is a good choice for postdocs, at least compared to the meager pay typical of academia. Beyond that, it is hard to justify staying for any extended amount of time. Get in, work hard, make a decent salary for a couple of years, and get out before the post-UC lab sucks the life out of you.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!