Skip to main content

What is the lab headcount?

Image
By scooby
Anonymous asked:

What is the current lab head count? (How much) has it dropped since the layoff (through
normal attrition and terminations)

(words in parenthesis added by BLOG master for clarity).

Comments

Anonymous said…
Go to a Lab pricer to see how many people works at the lab. If you have the lab pricer from previous years, then you can find out.
10/19/2008 5:58 PM
Anonymous said…
All that info is on the HR website.
10/20/2008 6:19 PM
Anonymous said…
These last two responses are worthless to those of us who left the lab already. Instead of telling people how to figure it out, please just post the answers.
10/20/2008 8:27 PM
Anonymous said…
LLNL Population by Workforce Status beginning October 1, 2008 on the HR Website.

Career Indefinite - 5099

Flex Term - 744

Post Doc - 119

Non Career - 442

Total LLNS - 6434
10/21/2008 1:02 PM
Anonymous said…
LLNL Pop summary

Career = 6596 (FY06)
Career = 6319 (FY07)
Career = 5251 (FY08)
Career = 5099 (FY09)

Non-Career = 787 (FY06)
Non-Career = 712 (FY07)
Non-Career = 508 (FY08)
Non-Career = 442 (FY09)

Post Doc = 137 (FY06)
Post Doc = 139 (FY07)
Post Doc = 131 (FY08)
Post Doc = 119 (FY09)

Term/Flex Term = 1127 (FY06)
Term/Flex Term = 1030 (FY07)
Term/Flex Term = 841 (FY08)
Term/Flex Term = 774 (FY09)

Grand Total = 8646 (FY06)
Grand Total = 8200 (FY07)
Grand Total = 6731 (FY08)
Grand Total = 6434 (FY09)


FY09 - as of 10/1/08
10/21/2008 1:18 PM
Anonymous said…
From 8646 (FY06) to 6434 (FY09) and, yet, more reductions are still coming.

Heckavajob, NNSA! You've managed to slowly kill off your national labs. The best and the brightest are fleeing in mass. The prestigious names are still up on the wall but anyone who works at these labs knows they are dead or dieing institutions.
10/23/2008 10:13 AM
Anonymous said…
From 8646 (FY06) to 6434 (FY09) and, yet, more reductions are still coming.

Heckavajob, NNSA! You've managed to slowly kill off your national labs. The best and the brightest are fleeing in mass. The prestigious names are still up on the wall but anyone who works at these labs knows they are dead or dieing institutions.
10/23/2008 10:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more