Skip to main content

TCP-1 in good shape.

Anonymous said:

For what its worth as a TPC-1er I received a letter from the Chairman of the LLNS Benefits & Investment Committee of the LLNS, LLC Board of Governors. It's dated Nov 25, 2009. I don't know if TPC-2ers also received it.

It is reproduced below in case it was not sent to all LLNL employees...

-------
Dear LLNS Defined Benefits Pension Plan Participant:

Many of you have asked questions regarding the health and security of your pension benefits and the potential for requiring employee contributions to the LLNL Plan in the future.

At the all-hands meeting on November 18, 2008, George Miller announced that the LLNS Plan is healthy and safe. Your pension benefit is a function of your years of service and salary. These factors provide you with a steady stream of monthly pension payments regardless of economic conditions. Your monthly pension payments (Plan liabilities) are made from assets in the LLNS Plan. Even though the financial markets have declined substantially in 2008, the LLNS Plan's assets remain considerably greater than its liabilities, and should continue to be sufficient to protect against future adverse economic conditions. Currently, the LLNS Plan's over-funded position makes it exempt from any contributions for the foreseeable future.

The LLNS Benefits & Investment Committee insures that the Plan assets are invested for the long term in a diversified portfolio among domestic and international stocks, fixed-income investments and cash. The goal of this diversified portfolio is to provide stability over the long haul to continue to pay the promised retirement pension payments to both current and future retirees.

Sincerely,
Paul E. Rosenkoetter
Chairman, Benefits & Investment Committee
-------

I plan to keep a copy of the letter for my lawyer in case LLNS forgets its promises.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sorry I made a typo - the date of the letter is November 25, 2008, not 2009.
Anonymous said…
"the LLNS Plan is healthy and safe"

"the LLNS Plan's assets remain considerably greater than its liabilities"

Is there a document stating the beginning total assets, current total assets and liabilities, YTD returns, assets allocations, etc ?
(like in real numbers ... instead of 'warm & fuzzy' sound bites ...'
)
Anonymous said…
A memo on the Benefits page at LANL currently states that the LANS TCP1 plan is down by about 25% as of late October. I find it a bit strange that LLNS is saying that the TCP1 plan at LLNL is just hunky dory. In general, most company pensions are currently report they are down by 25 to 30% from full funding after the Fall market crash.

I strongly suggest you use the "trust, but verify" method before getting too elated. Ask for the documents and read them closely. Unfortunately, at LANL the info LANS will officially give out only covers the year 2007.
Anonymous said…
I thought that under law (ERISA) the pension fund had to officially report to employees ? Can we get a statement from Lab management when this will happen ?
Anonymous said…
You better because they've broken every promise they've ever made since the took over. With GM, Ford and Chrysler looking for a handout of which they may or may not get, bankruptcy would be the next smart move on their behalf. When that happens and their employees are handed to PBGC, the PBGC is going to be looking for funds to keep them afloat. What better place to find these funds than an over funded TCP-1 pension program by an entity who too knows all contractual agreements are null and void upon filing chapter 11. What a scam corporate America has going. What the hell, at least you'll get 1/4 of what you were entitled too. That's a lot more than most people in this country at age 65 will have.
Anonymous said…
Looks like you got your wish 12:33 AM. An email was sent out saying that the TCP1 report was released on the benefits webpage. Maybe someone from benefits is reading this blog?

However, the report was for 2007.

I hope that we don't have to wait a whole year to get the 2008 report.
Anonymous said…
The report on TPC-1 sent to the Dept of Labor was for Oct 1, 2007 to Dec 31, 2007. I bet we won't see the full CY08 report until fall of 2009.

To summarize what was in the email from LLNS.

Benefits under the LLNS Defined Benefit Pension Plan (TPC-1) are provided through a trust fund. Plan expenses were $189,367 (all administrative expenses). A total of 3,927 persons were participants in or beneficiaries of the plan at the end of the year. The value of the plan assets, after subtracting liabilities of the plan, was $1,657,376,087 as of December 31, 2007.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!