Skip to main content

Anyone know why the bomb squad was at the lab?

I saw the bomb squad at NIF on Friday. What's up with that?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Someone brought on site a mortar and landmine, and it was not obvious they were inert.

And NIF wanted to know if they were getting them back.....lol

This is the same organization that pummels everyone else for any problem that occurs in NIF-land.
Anonymous said…
OK, I'll bite on this one. What would the reasoning be behind bringing a mortar and landmine into NIF? Has Ed Moses proposed using NIF to shoot mortars out of the air and as a land mine detector?

I am guessing that I won't be seeing this on the lab's Newsline or in the Lessons Learned.
Anonymous said…
A packaged was delivered to 482 that contained what I hear was a granade, probally just a glitch in the supply chainn and went to the wrong building. Gee people, you get all excited about nothing.
Anonymous said…
Gee people, you get all excited about nothing.
__________________________________

Seems to me if you don’t get excited about grenades (bombs, ordinance) being sent to an office building, then what would you get excited about. I believe that very few orders are placed for grenades, landmines, or the like at LLNL, and when these items end up anywhere except where they belong it is major breakdown of the system.

Are these things in unmarked packages being sent to occupant? It seems to me that someone or some company needs a top down review. I can only hope that none of these items ended up at B482, but if they did, you have one major problem.

Food for thought; if real explosive devices like a grenade end up in the hands of some fool that thinks it phony, pulls the pin to play a joke on his office buddies, people end up dead. Mothers, fathers, sons, daughters; families are devastated, live are lost; and it is nothing to get excited about!!!!!!

God help us if this is how LLNS is running things at the lab.
Anonymous said…
LLNL has been working on the Solid State Heat Capacity Laser for some time. It is intended to be a battlefield weapon. The lab is collaborating with entities outside, and an engineer was passed these items (presumably for evaluation), and brought them on-site.
Anonymous said…
July 21 7:16

An engineer passed the grenade for "evaluation?" What kind of engineer doesn't read the sign posted upon entering the Lab. Ignorance is no excuse for their stupidity. They should be written up for the error. He might be stupid enough to pull the pin!!!!
Anonymous said…
Were the various munitions painted blue?
Anonymous said…
"Were the various munitions painted blue?'

No.
Anonymous said…
The blue question was related to them potentially being training aids versus the real thing.

When will we get a lessoned learned?

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...