Skip to main content

More on the future of DOE...


Institute for Policy Study article

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Despite the president's rhetoric about reshaping America's energy future, the DOE budget for FY 2010, minus stimulus spending, looks a lot like that of George W. Bush and several presidents before him."


OMG! The Pube's are going to have a fit.
Anonymous said…
Good, they were never able to compete in an alternative energy starved world anyway. They've proved that decades ago and they're still proving it today. NIF is not about alternative energy and by the time LIFE comes along the population of the world will be dead.

America needs a resource NOW not decades from now.

You people really should view a special on the history channel entitled Renewable Energy and see just how long we've had our heads up our butts. We are our own worse enemy and the clowns in Washington DC no matter what party are responsible for our oil dependency and the demise of this nation in many ways.

I'm a republican all the way and definitely not a socialist.
Anonymous said…
I'm a republican all the way and definitely not a socialist.

Ahh good, Neko let political commentary back in to stimulate some blog participation.

I'm an independent and definitely not a tea party dead-ender. But if Sarah showed in hip waders, I'd attend. You betcha!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem

From the Huffington Post Why Workplace Jargon Is A Big Problem http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/25/work-words_n_5159868.html?utm_hp_ref=business&ir=Business When we replace a specific task with a vague expression, we grant the task more magnitude than it deserves. If we don't describe an activity plainly, it seems less like an easily achievable goal and more like a cloudy state of existence that fills unknowable amounts of time. A fog of fast and empty language has seeped into the workplace. I say it's time we air it out, making room for simple, concrete words, and, therefore, more deliberate actions. By striking the following 26 words from your speech, I think you'll find that you're not quite as overwhelmed as you thought you were. Count the number that LLNLs mangers use.  touch base circle back bandwidth - impactful - utilize - table the discussion deep dive - engagement - viral value-add - one-sheet deliverable - work product - incentivise - take it to the ...