Skip to main content

More on the future of DOE...


Institute for Policy Study article

Comments

Anonymous said…
"Despite the president's rhetoric about reshaping America's energy future, the DOE budget for FY 2010, minus stimulus spending, looks a lot like that of George W. Bush and several presidents before him."


OMG! The Pube's are going to have a fit.
Anonymous said…
Good, they were never able to compete in an alternative energy starved world anyway. They've proved that decades ago and they're still proving it today. NIF is not about alternative energy and by the time LIFE comes along the population of the world will be dead.

America needs a resource NOW not decades from now.

You people really should view a special on the history channel entitled Renewable Energy and see just how long we've had our heads up our butts. We are our own worse enemy and the clowns in Washington DC no matter what party are responsible for our oil dependency and the demise of this nation in many ways.

I'm a republican all the way and definitely not a socialist.
Anonymous said…
I'm a republican all the way and definitely not a socialist.

Ahh good, Neko let political commentary back in to stimulate some blog participation.

I'm an independent and definitely not a tea party dead-ender. But if Sarah showed in hip waders, I'd attend. You betcha!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

tcp1 looking good

I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...