Skip to main content

Best and brightest

Image
By scooby
Anonymous wants to know:

I was wondering if people would recommend starting a career as a scientist at llnl right now. Is there any benefit left over going to private industry?

Comments

Anonymous said…
After helping win the cold war the mission of the lab and the funding for the lab have become tenuous. I don't have a crystal ball so I can't predict the future, but I don't see any bright rainbows on the horizon. Come to the lab for a JOB. Get some experience. But don't come for a career, the golden age of this lab is now in the rear view mirror.

You've got to put up with a lot of rules and regulations that in my view do not add value to projects. We no longer have job security. If you come to the lab now you'll be TCP2, which is no better than what you'll get on the outside. Medical in retirement has turned into a pile of ashes.

Come for a job, but not a career.
9/13/2009 6:48 PM
Anonymous said…
There is no advantage to working at LLNL vs. industry. If the job suits you, take it. If another job comes along that suits you better, take. That's all there is to that.
9/13/2009 9:56 PM
Anonymous said…
In my experience, the lab offers decent pay, interesting work, cutting-edge resources, and some very bright colleagues to learn from. The downside is the absolutely absurd amount of bureaucracy and overhead.

I'd rather do "science in the national interest" than work in industry, but I wish there weren't so many obstacles to getting real work done!
9/14/2009 9:50 AM
Anonymous said…
If you can get a job in private industry with stock options, then you have a chance to work hard and get rich.

Working for LLNL, all you are doing is filling the deep pockets of people like Riley Bechtel and the well paid lab executives running LLNS.
9/14/2009 10:34 AM
Anonymous said…
There are no longer careers at LANS/LLNS. I spent the last 30-years working in the nuclear weapon program winning the Cold War at LANS only to be forced out of the weapon program by Brett Knapp. I'm now at TA-55 cleaning the floors. Forewarning to new employees is that you no longer have input on where or what you will work on at LANS/LLNS. I am absolutely DEAD SERIOUS about this. LANS/LLNS will make that decision for you, thank you very much. Take your CAREERS elsewhere!
9/14/2009 9:37 PM
Anonymous said…
Anybody seen the employee engagement survey that is being done over at LANL? Is LLNS planning a similar effort to gauge the opinions of our employees?
9/15/2009 9:39 AM
Anonymous said…
Starting at LLNL? Depends. Are you a younger, just out of college recruit, or an experienced professional in a career change?
9/15/2009 8:06 PM
Anonymous said…
The best part about TCP2 is that it is totally portable. Whether it takes you 6 months or 6 years to find a better job elsewhere, you can leave with everything.
9/15/2009 8:17 PM
Anonymous said…
The Lab is dying. Once nuclear material is gone and the Superblock is closed, the rest of the weapons program will not be far behind.

With dollars shrinking and nuclear weapons in disfavor, whatever work remains will be at LANL.

If you can get a job there now, don't miss the opportunity.
9/15/2009 8:19 PM
Anonymous said…
The DOE energy labs are the place to be.
9/15/2009 9:55 PM
Neko said…
Best and Brightest? God, I hope not. I would think that the best and brightest would not look at a sinking ship with any hope.
9/19/2009 9:37 AM
Anonymous said…
8:06 here. My queston was not answered, which makes me think whoever wrote it wasn't looking for an answer, or to start a career at the lab. It was quite an odd question as well, because if they just read the blog and lanl's they would have answered their own question.

Perhaps we are just talking with ourselves, taking turns sending in questions.
9/19/2009 10:43 PM
Anonymous said…
If you can get hooked in to a niche area that will allow you to publish or work directly with sponsors in can be pretty good. You must be very motivated to work here and set clear goals for what you want to do. Otherwise, the lab offers a blend of the worse of industry and academics.

Pros
Some really cool niche science
mature scientific workforce (they know much more than you would think)
ability to pull diverse scientist together to solve problems
Very professional scientific staff
Lots of flexibility in with your time
Internal support (mostly tied to kisssing butt, like every else)

Cons
High overheads
unmotivated support staff
Insane rules and regulations
little access to journals
limited access to facilities and computers depending on nationality
low moral workforce
Poor management not based in scientific realities
9/22/2009 8:11 AM
Anonymous said…
thx for all the advice... sorry for the delay, to answer one question i'm younger starting college recruit with phd. they say wouldn't be able to externally publish due to nature of work...

job market is tough right now, esp academia. so i'm considering it at least as a job for a while until things clear up. would be nice if I found something that I liked for a longer term
9/27/2009 7:17 PM
Anonymous said…
Do phd's really write like that these days? No wonder China is kicking our donkey.
9/30/2009 7:01 PM
Anonymous said…
Yeah, its how we write. Here's a paper a colleague published recently:
http://isotropic.org/papers/chicken.pdf
10/06/2009 1:52 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

tcp1 looking good

By scooby
I just received my annual TCP-1 letter from LLNS and a summary of the LLNS Pension Plan. Looked in pretty good shape in 2013. About 35% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 134.92%). This was a decrease from 2012 where it was 51% overfunded (funding target attainment percentage = 151.59%). They did note that the 2012 change in the law on how liabilities are calculated using interest rates improved the plan's position. Without the change the funding target attainment percentages would have been 118% (2012) and 105% (2013). 2013 assets = $2,057,866,902 2013 liabilities = $1,525,162,784 vs 2012 assets = $1,844,924,947 2012 liabilities = $1,217,043,150 It was also noted that a slightly different calculation method ("fair market value") designed to show a clearer picture of the plan' status as December 31, 2013 had; Assets = $2,403,098,433 Liabilities = $2,068,984,256 Funding ratio = 116.15% Its a closed plan with 3,781 participants. Of that number, 3,151 wer...
105 comments
Read more