Skip to main content

LLNL de-inventory project moves ahead

Anonymously contributed:

NNSA Press Release

LLNL de-inventory project moves ahead

Oct. 1, 2009

The National Nuclear Security Administration on Wednesday announced that the Laboratory has removed about two thirds of its special nuclear material requiring the highest level of security protection.

LLNL has completed shipments to five different receiver sites, including Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Nevada Test Site, the Savannah River Site, Y-12 Security Complex, and the Idaho National Laboratory, since the de-inventory project was initiated in October 2006. These shipments were completed in full compliance with existing safety and environmental laws and procedures. All federal and receiver site requirements were met for these shipments.

“The removal of two thirds of LLNL’s nuclear material demonstrates real progress and is the result of some very hard work,” NNSA Administrator Thomas D’Agostino said. “NNSA continues to make tremendous strides in transforming a Cold War nuclear weapons complex into a 21st century Nuclear Security Enterprise that is smaller, safer, more efficient. Staying on schedule in meeting our commitment to remove all special nuclear material from Livermore is a major part of that effort.”

The move is part of NNSA’s efforts to consolidate special nuclear material at five sites by 2012, with significantly reduced square footage at those sites by 2017. This will further improve security and reduce security costs and is part of NNSA's overall effort to transform the Cold War era nuclear weapons enterprise into a 21st century nuclear security enterprise.

The original date to remove all high-security material from LLNL, based on equipment capability and capacity, was 2014. NNSA has developed a timeline to remove this material as early as possible, accelerating the target completion date to 2012.

=====

So any guesses on what happens to LLNL after 2012?

Comments

Anonymous said…
"So any guesses on what happens to LLNL after 2012?" - Post

Well, I just saw the trailer for the new movie "2012", so I'll tell you.

LLNL and most of California falls off into the Pacific Ocean. That's what happens after 2012.

The good news is that you won't have to worry about an insecure job at a dying lab any longer! Come to think about it, maybe LLNS can pitch a new mega-project that can help stop all this bad "2012" stuff from happening. Heck, maybe even the NIF can somehow be folded into the effort.
Thief said…
So the is why RHWM is being infested by the superbblockheads! The rats are abandoning the ship!
Anonymous said…
More layoffs, what else. And along the way there will be many more to go as construction stops and "all we ask is one a day" shots begin. It's just business people and LLNS has to look good to DOE by showing they are reducing cost and making the footprint smaller.
Anonymous said…
"So any guesses on what happens to LLNL after 2012?"

Well it's very simple....you too will be out of a job. There will be a few 'bodies' remaining at LLNL to keep the area secured and nothing more.

When LLNL went up for bid it was the beginning of the end.

I should consider myself extremely lucky to have been one of the first to be ISP'd....I did get a 'mediocre' severance package...doubtful anyone laid off since then will get one. UNLESS you are a "MANAGER' of some sort there are NO current benefits to being an "employee" at LLNS now, emotionally, physically or financially....you know this and so does every other employee out there!!!

Just remember this, eventually these overpaid managers who make the choices FOR you, your income will also find themselves out of work very, very soon...they are not part of the existing contractors team....they have kissed butt to keep their jobs and throw thousands of people just like you under the bus at EVERY corner.

Management and these overpaid contractors do NOT give a damn about you.

It is my understanding that Rick Runnels left LLNL September 25th. He did his "job" there very well. Took all the current processes in place and removed them as well as the people who actually got work done. He created and stagnated the processes so bad you can't even get a feeking light bulb changed. He DESTROYED peoples lives/families/livelihood for the sake of HIS paycheck...he got hired to do ANOTHER (cutthroat) job!!
Don't even get me started on Frank Russo....!!!!!

You DO have my compassion.

Be smart, quit the sinking ship. Actively pursue taking your talents elsewhere to where they will be appreciated. ALL employers are now 'contract' so whats the difference?

You may find that another employer will pay more for your quality work. Many who have voluntarily left after the ISP have found better jobs.

Change is hard, especially if you have years at LLNL or have never worked elsewhere O/S of the lab, but please, begin the process now for yourself and those depending on you otherwise you will find yourself left out in the cold.

Good luck to you and the others who have to live through this extreme pain everyday!!!!!!
Anonymous said…
A major result of de-inventory will be that many of the safety weenies and LSO bureaucrats will be out of a job. There is a silver lining.
Anonymous said…
The safety weenies and LSO bureaucrats will find something to do here, how is that a silver lining for anyone?
Anonymous said…
The Lab will lose hundreds of jobs when nuclear material is gone, but LSO will not go without its fair share of cuts also. LSO has been told to plan for a staff size appropriate for a college research site. That is why LSO senior management is opposing de-inventory and dragging its feet wherever it can.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!