Skip to main content

Does an average of 1% raise motivate you?

Anonymous wants to know if an average of 1% raise motivate you to excel.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Of course!!

That was sarcasm in case you missed it...
Anonymous said…
Answer:NO
Anonymous said…
It's a joke and all while ULM gets bonus checks and big raises for downsizing, cutting old people and hiring the young at half the wages whereby they'll work them into the grave with no defined pension program and when they get close to retirement, they'll screw them too. It's all good. Welcome to OWO.
Anonymous said…
Why, that 1% is just the icing on the moral/motivation cake.

Layoffs
More Rules
More Regulations
Ambiguous Mission
An ever widening gap between upper management and the workers

and of course

1% raise (if you've been nice)

Yup, that's what gets my motor started in the morning, raring to go to help save the nation for another day.
Anonymous said…
Any raise is better than what a lot of people are facing elsewhere: furloughs, givebacks, layoffs. Many of us are motivated by having interesting, important work and are holding on through the bumpy ride.
Anonymous said…
LLNL has been in a death spiral for years. Each year management siphon off more research funds, staff morale is non-existent, facilities are dirtier each day. Perhaps its time to stop worrying about 1% raises and think about one's sanity. Away from this toxic hell-hole, with its worthless parasitic managers, life can be enjoyable. Use the lab to get marketable skills and experience then move on.
Anonymous said…
Well +1% is better than the -100% that 10% of Californians got this year! Be thankful of that.
Anonymous said…
I have to agree with 8:37 PM.

Look at your raises. They are basically telling you to go away. It is a form of constructive discharge.
Anonymous said…
And another comment about "being thankful". That's like thanking a drug dealer for the contaminated heroin he's selling you.

Leaving LLNL is painful. But the only way you can grow is facing hard reality. Otherwise you just keep taking the happy drugs until it kills you.

After years of bad pay, lousy leadership, insults, and abuse any sane person should be seriously questioning why they still want to continue what is at best a highly toxic relationship.

Take the deep breath and make a break for the door. The sooner you do, the happier you'll be once you discover life outside the Lab.
Anonymous said…
Pay at LLNL is not bad. Most people (including me) took a pay cut when they left. You're deluding yourself.
Anonymous said…
I took a 5% pay cut. But then again I moved to a place where the cost of housing is 30% less. I also received a 4% pay raise last year. AND I still get to do interesting stuff in the national interest.
Anonymous said…
Enjoy the half percent raise; gosh, if I made $20K per month and got the whole half percent that would be $100/mo! Well that would offset the ~$200/month increase for Anthem's health insurance coverage. Trouble is, most of us don't make that and will be faced with the insurance increase of $100 per month. Well, I guess the fee and taxes have to come from somewhere. Inspiring raise.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!