Skip to main content

Invisible costs!

Anonymously contributed:

Read this George:

Warren Buffet writes in the Berkshire-Hathaway annual letter to shareholders this year that:

"We would rather suffer the visible costs of a few bad decisions than incur the many invisible costs that come from decisions made too slowly – or not at all – because of a stifling bureaucracy."

Compare this to the DOE/NNSA/LLNS and LANS, who would rather suffer the many invisible costs from decisions made too slowly--or not at all--because of a stifling bureaucracy than incur the visible costs of a few bad decisions.

This in a nutshell is what has gone so wrong at the Labs and their owning agencies, by Congressional demand.

Comments

Anonymous said…
You cannot put Warren Buffet in the same category as DOE/NNSA LANS & LLNS management. Mr Buffet is a business man!
Anonymous said…
This in a nutshell is what has gone so wrong at the Labs and their owning agencies, by Congressional demand.

While I concur, this is ancient history. This war was fought & won by Congress/DOE some years ago now. Blame the big gorilla contractor now but it was Congress/DOE that made it happen. You must have been uninvolved when “Contract Reform” was playing out in DOE.

It’s too late to do anything now. Move on, move out or live with what you’ve got.
Anonymous said…
You cannot compare Warren Buffet with DOE/NNSA management or LLNS management
Warren Buffet = Business Man
DOE/NNSA = Bureaucrats
LLNS = Leeches
Anonymous said…
"While I concur, this is ancient history. This war was fought & won by Congress/DOE some years ago now. Blame the big gorilla contractor now but it was Congress/DOE that made it happen".

I disagree, its our friends within the fence that have driven taxes through the roof to pay bloated staff and to subsidize favorite programs such as NIF.

Its also the hidden direct fees in support that most institutes normally cover or don't actually have. The taxing of travel, publications, supplies, cleaning, and lab/office upgrades, should not be overlooked as part of the hidden fees local management has levied against the staff. For awhile, one of the divisions was told they had to pay individually for their copier paper. They have managed to attach a cost + 50% to everything. Or how about retroactive taxes on WFO when you fall short of covering the management team.

You can keep blaming Congress/DOE and NNSA for some of the woes at the National labs, but the real problem and harm comes from within.
Anonymous said…
"Or how about retroactive taxes on WFO when you fall short of covering the management team." - 9:09 AM


This one is especially egregious and has happened at both LLNL and LANL.

Lab management tells you, as the PI, to be especially careful about watching the budget for charges associated with WFOs.

Then, they suddenly turn around and apply huge new overhead taxes to these same WFO accounts and apply them retroactively to help cover for the growing management and support "bloat" at the labs!

It's amazing that anyone left at the NNSA labs is still working to bring in WFO funding given the way management treats these accounts.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!