Skip to main content

Notice from moderator

Image
By scooby
Hello!
More than 50% of the comments I have been getting are destructive criticism, mainly about how slow I am at publishing posts and comments.

Visitors have to realize I am not sitting in a rocking chair with a laptop on my lap waiting impatiently for your posts and comments.

If you want this blog to move faster and improve, please contribute your time towards that, otherwise hold your criticism.

This blog is not rated, ranked or reviewed for performance. If you count on it for entertainment, you are in the wrong place. If you experiencing memory difficulties, go back and read "BLOG purpose".

I will not respond or post anything complaining about slow, boring, useless etc... this blog is.

After all, you are free to visit or not to visit this BLOG.

Thank you for visiting and contributing!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yikes! One has to wonder why you are doing this at all.
4/30/2010 12:22 PM
scooby said…
Again, read BLOG purpose.
Kindly,
4/30/2010 2:11 PM
Anonymous said…
Snoppy. Please recognize that the critics have an agenda. They attempting to wear you down the same way they wore Frank and Doug ( LANL: The Rest of the Story) down. Their agenda is simple, shut the LLNS blog down, it's airing LANS/LLNS dirty, stinky, and corrupt laundry. Hang in there, we appreciate your efforts!
4/30/2010 4:41 PM
Anonymous said…
No, why are YOU doing this??
4/30/2010 7:10 PM
Anonymous said…
Things have improved remarkably at Los Alamos since the awful LANL blog shut down.

Employee morale has gained and staff are pitching in with their hard working LANS upper management to make LANL the best ever!

Worker efficiency is rising and productivity is improving with each passing day. The trend is ever upward to perfection with LANS! Hundreds of employees are posting insightful comments on the new LANL Performance Blog. Come join the LANS team!

Things will only get better at LLNS once this blog, too, is shut down. Think about it.
5/02/2010 11:04 AM
Anonymous said…
5/2 11:04 am was a regular on the LANL blog in the weeks before it was shut down. Unfortunately, his tongue-in-cheek parody of LANS management wasn't appreciated by many, and his postings drew an ever increasing amount of vitriol, which of course was, and is, his aim. Hopefully the LLNL folks aren't as irony-challenged and will just ignore his juvenile attempts at inciting argument for argument's sake.
5/02/2010 7:18 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

By scooby
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
155 comments
Read more

Trump is to gut the labs.

By scooby
The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.
124 comments
Read more

Rumor corner

By scooby
LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.
92 comments
Read more