Anonymously contributed:
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board no longer to meet with Cook
There must be more to this than a mere shuffling of the organization chart.
===========================================================================
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"September 5, 2012
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
625 Indiana Avenue NW, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20004
=============================================================================
Dear Dr. Winokur:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since I was confirmed by the Senate as the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs in June 2010, I have been meeting with you and other members of the Board on a regular basis. A series of organizational changes within NNSA has been made over the past year. In September 2011, the position of Associate Administrator for Acquisition and Project Management (APM) was created, and the line accountabilities for major construction projects beyond Critical Decision 2 were reassigned from Defense Programs to APM. In April 2012, the position of Associate Administrator for Infrastructure and Operations (NA-OO) was created, and the line accountabilities for the NNSA Site Office Managers were reassigned from Defense Programs to NA-OO. In August 2012, accountability for NNSA infrastructure that underpins both non-nuclear and nuclear facility operations was reassigned from Defense Programs to NA-OO.
Given the cumulative effect of these changes, it is appropriate that the regular meetings we have had should cease and an NNSA representative in the line management of nuclear safety replace me. The Administrator will determine the appropriate representation shortly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Donald L. Cook"
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
1. Cook does not want to spend his time meeting with them.
2. Cook is on his way out and is punting this to someone else.
3. Congress "helped" Cook to make the move.
4. Cook is being loyal to the Administration, and doing his part to move NNSA away from weapons.
5. CMRR-NF and PF-4 are such major DNFSB challenges that they drove the whole enterprise to move.
6. Random act of kindness.
September 6, 2012 12:30 PM
Refer to #4 above.
Don"
I have one question. Huh?
Sincerely, DNFSB