Anonymoulsy contributed:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weapons Complex Monitor
September 27, 2012
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE IG Finds no Problems with Livermore Strategy to Maintain Guard Force
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retention bonuses paid to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory guards to keep them at the site as it downsized its security posture were reasonable, the Department of Energy’s Inspector General said in a report released yesterday. The IG said it investigated claims that the lab experienced “excessive” security costs while it maintained security to protect Category I/II special nuclear material, but it found no problem with $15.2 million in retention bonuses distributed from Fiscal Year 2010 to FY 2012 that helped the site maintain its guard force. The NNSA said Friday that it had completely removed special nuclear material requiring the highest, and most expensive, levels of protection, and that it expects to save $30 million a year by reducing security at the lab. In its report, the IG said that guards earned $50,000 bonuses if they stayed at the lab through Sept. 30, 2012. “According to a Livermore official, the retention bonuses helped to maintain the number of security personnel at the levels required for Security Category I/II protection throughout the deinventory, as well as maintain the morale amongst the impacted security personnel,” the IG said. The NNSA also authorized a 12-month transition phase through Sept. 30, 2013, to help guards move to other jobs after the deinventorying effort was complete. The lab will lay off guards over the next few months as part of a workforce restructuring plan.
Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...
Comments
Hey Ed, isn't that what we paid you to do?
Meanwhile, the for-profit LLC executive managers get annual 20% bonuses and the security guard get an extra $50,000 per year!
Something is very wrong at the NNSA science labs.
Most of the guys there are a bunch of wanna be hardcore soldiers and cops, specially the Special Response Team or (SRT) instructors and officers.
The truth is that the PFD instructors and officers are just over paid Security Guards! These guys have no authority! As a matter of fact, they have less authority than Security Guards that you see at your local bank!
If something was to happen there, they would have to call local law enforcement to respond because they have no authority.
They only thing that they are allowed to do there is observe and report suspicious activity.
These have have less authority than a Walmart Security Guard!
At least Walmart Security Guards have some authority. PFD officers are 100% Security Guards with 0 authority!!!