Skip to main content

Eyes On, Hands Off

Eyes On, Hands Off

This policy of NNSA is getting a lot of press recently, as the momentum is shifting from less oversight of lab contractors to more oversight by federal groups. Somewhere it was mentioned that this policy came from Don Cook when the local sites reported to him, before this function was shifted to some other box in NNSA. As the policy is now history, when will Cook also be history?

Comments

Anonymous said…
Is Cook the big villain (rather than any of the cast of unsavory characters like foster or Moses or McMillan) because cook and his nnsa power players are mostly former Sandians? I hear variations of the same theme - that somehow they have an agenda to destroy LLNL while giving Sandia preferential treatment? It would sound like a wild conspiracy theory if it were not for the pervasiveness of the innuendo and accusations. Take for instance the comparatively mild impact of sequestration on Sandia vs LANL and LLNL and the disbelief some have in Sandia's explanation. I've heard suggestions that Sandia will need to give up some of its business to the other lab out of fairness. It will be interesting to see how this pans out. Will Sandia's portfolio diversification intended for long term stability and growth end up costing them, while the poor performing design labs get rewarded for failure?
Anonymous said…
We had the directors of the 3 labs and others testify before congress that they had fixed things and that NNSA and it's tight oversight should be relaxed. It seemed like those statements were accepted by some on the Hill. Then Y12 comes up with its debacle and it would appear the pendulum will swing to the bureaucracy side even worse than what we have now. Even if they took the labs out from NNSA and put them in DOE, I would venture that the velvet glove would be replaced with an iron fist. Good times ahead for one and all.
Anonymous said…
Then Y12 comes up with its debacle...

March 16, 2013 at 5:53 PM

Ridiculous. It was not a "debacle" it was a small embarrassment that was blown all out of proportion by the press, DC bureaucrats, and you. No one was injured or killed, no damage occurred, and no national security secrets or nuclear material were lost. However, this is now the way the world works: make a mistake and you should be shot yesterday. Thanks to the internet, we are all reduced to ignorant fools, because that's who make up 95% of the apparent "public"; i.e., those who choose to shoot their mouths off with no knowledge and unfortunately have access to a computer.
Anonymous said…
I think the author intended for the reference to a debacle to coincide with your observation that things got blown out of proportion. The outrage factor in the y12 event really amplified the response in DC. I think you both are pretty much on the same page. Please refrain from the ad hominem followups. It gives blog owners more reason to remove anonymous postings.
Anonymous said…
For the security force at Y12, it was a debacle. It was total failure of their security in layers. The only thing that kept it from being a huge national/international incident was the attacking force and their intentions.

For the contractor who no longer runs the show, I don't think they'd call it a minor embarrassment.

For Sandia,LLNS and LANS arguing that NNSA is too intrusive the backlash of congress will be a total failure in their efforts to get NNSA to operate in a sensible manner.

But back to the main headline of Eyes On, Hands Off. We are going to switch from a self given eye exam to a prostate exam by someone with sharp finger nails.
Anonymous said…
SNL and Y-12 are the key labs in the new NNSA infrastructure. Just look at recent history. The other labs are window dressing that can be tossed aside as the federal budgets continue to decline.
Anonymous said…
Neither can do Pu research. Unless you think that's not necessary for the maintenance of the stockpile.
Anonymous said…
Can you say a little bit about why Pu research is necessary for maintaining the stockpile? I know that there's PU in there, but what do we not already know about it?
Anonymous said…
March 23, 2013 at 10:38 AM

Aging and phase stability issues, long-term corrosion when in contact with other materials in weapons, longevity of wrought vs cast, changes in crystal structure and mechanical response (static and dynamic), macro mechanical issues such as fracture toughness and environmental stability. None of which represented problems with a dynamically changing stockpile. Long-term, there are worries about reliability.

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

Rumor corner

LLNS may have excluded the wrong people in last VSSOP? The exclusions were based on outdated job categories and related skills. ULM are now thinking that in the future, job categories and functional areas will have to be re-defined. The next VSSOP/ISP will be based on the new categories and functional areas. The questions I have are: 1) Why didnt they think of that before the transition. It seems like their style is “change things as you go”. Planning is out the window! 2) Who will give input on the new changes? The next RIF apparently is going to be more lucrative than the VSSOP. Depending on the length of employment, a RIFed person, not only gets their 1 week pay per year of service but also from 30 to 120 days notice, essentially 30 to 120 days pay. Please feel free to comment on the rumors or add new ones you actually heard.