Skip to main content

Furlough like event in June?

What's the word on the June furlough-like event?

Comments

Anonymous said…
What I heard is that it is still an option. Also instead of a $120 Million dollar funding shortfall, it is now a $65 Million dollar funding shortfall.

I don't know about other departments, it seems Akima folks are getting let go every week.
Anonymous said…
The rumors are deep but what were hearing is NIF owes $32M in taxes. The lay-offs that are occurring will take care of that $32M debt and will get NIF by until June. By that time they'll confirm they're short $80M for FY14 which means they'll resolve that $80M in the same manner they're resolving the $32M. This means ~266 more to go before Dec 2013. All is on time, on schedule and all is well.
Anonymous said…
VSP and layoffs are coming. NIF has hired 2 ex-Enron accountants to put all that savings into their account.
Anonymous said…
Soon to be announced, a VSP with no incentives - just one week of pay for every year worked up to 26 weeks. They want at least 400 to take it and leave by early summer. This is to cover FY14 budget shortfalls.

Also, in summer the 10% pay reduction begins, 2 days a month forced off with no pay, this addresses sequester shortfall in FY13.
Anonymous said…
April 19, 2013 at 6:12 AM

Sorry dude, "one week of pay for every year worked up to 26 weeks" is not enoght to get rid of anyone. Better to be RIF's and laod off and draw two years of unempoyement that this chump change. Again, 2 weeks pay for every year of service or 1 years pay and 50% gone in one week.
thief said…
Sorry dude, "one week of pay for every year worked up to 26 weeks" is not enough (sis) to get rid of anyone. Better to be RIF'd and laid off and draw two years of unempoyement that this chump change. Again, 2 weeks pay for every year of service or 1 years pay and 50% gone in one week.

Ding ding ding....we have a winner! tell him what he's won Johnny.
Anonymous said…
LLNS has not yet issued any WARN Notices for 2013, nor has Akima. It's a good thing to keep your eyes open though.
http://www.edd.ca.gov/Jobs_and_Training/warn/eddwarncnal13.pdf
Anonymous said…
6:12 AM, and you know this how??
Anonymous said…
Call me cynical, but I don't expect the lab to do a VSIP. The layoff policies have been re-written to allow the lab to easily move people out the door. With a VSIP, maybe that promising employee that the lab would prefer to keep walks out the door. Without a VSIP, maybe that desired employee hangs in there. The separation pay in a RIF would be the same as people here are proposing for a VSIP so the expense to the lab would be roughly the same, and with the RIF, the lab gets rid of the people they choose.
So, kiss up to a manager if you want to stay or get on his bad side if you want to guarantee your entry into the RIF Raffle. But if there is a VSIP and you get between me and a door, you're at risk for tread marks as I beat feet.
Anonymous said…
There will be a VSP not a VSIP. No incentive, just one week of pay up to 26 weeks. If 400 employyes don't take this, then the forced RIF may happen.
Anonymous said…
There will be a VSP not a VSIP. No incentive, just one week of pay up to 26 weeks. If 400 employyes don't take this, then the forced RIF may happen.

They'll cut the oldsters....and they'll get another lawsuit....still less will get done....and morale will fall still further.

The whole lab can't consist exclusively of 20 somethings banging away on computer keyboards can it?
Anonymous said…
Perhaps it will be a Wellness "furlong" event and those crossing the finish line last get to head over to the processing center.
Anonymous said…
LLNL will likely do what LANL did back in April of 2012 with their VSP offer, except with the new severance limits imposed (26 weeks max).

I don't believe that the labs need to issue a WARN type warning period for these types of offers. It was all executed very rapidly at LANL with only two weeks allowed for staff to think about taking the offer and out the door within the next 30 days.

At LANL, the VSP "offer" was extremely attractive to a lot of staff who were fed up and ready to get out. Along with the contractors who were fired, LANL reduced the workforce by around 12% in 2012.

It your turn, now, LLNL. Enjoy!
Anonymous said…
"The whole lab can't consist exclusively of 20 somethings banging away on computer keyboards can it?" -- 8:31 AM


Yes, it can... except for the bloated management team, of course. These youngsters are: (a) energetic, (b) very cheap, (c) get much fewer benefits, and (d) don't see the labs as a long term career choice. They are a perfect fit for the new, "for-profit" NNSA science labs.

Of course, this may not be the best choice if you care about US national security but who worries about that any longer?
Anonymous said…
Maybe a VSP will be offered at the same time that the furlough goes into effect, and they give you the 26 weeks of pay at the furlough rate (-10%). Anything to save a buck.
Anonymous said…
At LANL, the VSP "offer" was extremely attractive to a lot of staff who were fed up and ready to get out.

Define "extremely attractive".
Anonymous said…
39 weeks of severance pay.
Anonymous said…
39 weeks of severance pay.

April 20, 2013 at 2:06 PM

McMillan divided that figure by 2 for future RIFs immediately after this RIF. He got a nice untaxed bonus in return for this favor.
Anonymous said…
He got a nice untaxed bonus in return for this favor.

April 20, 2013 at 8:32 PM

Right. As if you have any evidence of that. Asshole.
Anonymous said…
Why are you guys attacking the young employees? That is age-ism.
Anonymous said…
Why are you guys attacking the young employees? That is age-ism.

April 21, 2013 at 1:20 PM

Oh shut up. PC police.
Anonymous said…
Can managers or your boss make you work on furlough-like days?
Anonymous said…

No. That would be illegal.
Anonymous said…
I thought LLNL had some weird scheme that allows employees to work but the lab still stay within the law, I.e., furlough-like but not an actual furlough. Tbh sounds like there should be a lawsuit to get the courts to determine if indeed they are acting within the law.
Anonymous said…
Some bosses think they can get a 10% reduction in labor costs, and then plan for you to work on the furlough day because you're salaried.
Anonymous said…
Wow, squeezing out 10% more work by having the salaried staff continue working during those "furlough" hours coupled with the 10% reduction in salaries being skimmed of the top for the TCP1 pension.... a 20% reduction in lab salaries in the last few years with more cuts to follow.

Just great! That's they way to hire the best.
Vernell said…
This is cool!

Popular posts from this blog

Plutonium Shots on NIF.

Tri-Valley Cares needs to be on this if they aren't already. We need to make sure that NNSA and LLNL does not make good on promises to pursue such stupid ideas as doing Plutonium experiments on NIF. The stupidity arises from the fact that a huge population is placed at risk in the short and long term. Why do this kind of experiment in a heavily populated area? Only a moron would push that kind of imbecile area. Do it somewhere else in the god forsaken hills of Los Alamos. Why should the communities in the Bay Area be subjected to such increased risk just because the lab's NIF has failed twice and is trying the Hail Mary pass of doing an SNM experiment just to justify their existence? Those Laser EoS techniques and the people analyzing the raw data are all just BAD anyways. You know what comes next after they do the experiment. They'll figure out that they need larger samples. More risk for the local population. Stop this imbecilic pursuit. They wan...

Trump is to gut the labs.

The budget has a 20% decrease to DOE office of science, 20% cut to NIH. NASA also gets a cut. This will  have a huge negative effect on the lab. Crazy, juts crazy. He also wants to cut NEA and PBS, this may not seem like  a big deal but they get very little money and do great things.

LLNL un-diversity

Actual post from Dec. 15 from one of the streams. This is a real topic. As far as promoting women and minorities even if their qualifications are not as good as the white male scientists, I am all for it. We need diversity at the lab and if that is what it takes, so be it.  Quit your whining. Look around the lab, what do you see? White male geezers. How many African Americans do you see at the lab? Virtually none. LLNL is one of the MOST undiverse places you will see. Face it folks, LLNL is an institution of white male privilege and they don't want to give up their privileged positions. California, a state of majority Hispanics has the "crown jewel" LLNL nestled in the middle of it with very FEW Hispanics at all!